company-name-logo

Royal Enfield

Latest Judgments

Total 219 Consumer Court Cases Against Royal Enfield.

Uttarakhand

Royal Enfield Suri Sales Pvt.Ltd. V/S Shri Jagjeet Singh

Royal Enfield  

Court Name: Nainital

Appelant Advocate Shri Sumit Bajaj

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 124

|

Date of Filing: 25-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 19-08-2017

Haryana

ROYAL ENFIELD V/S VAIBHAV BHASIN

Royal Enfield  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate PULKIT DAGAR

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 608 of 2017Date of Institution: 18.05.2017Date of Decision: 20.07.2017Vaibhav Bhasin son of Shri Sunil Kumar Bhasin, resident of House No.416, Sector 16, Urban Estate, Karnal.Appellant-ComplainantVe...

Case Number: 608

|

Date of Filing: 18-05-2017

|

Date of Upload: 25-07-2017

Karnataka

Royal Enfield (Unit of Eicher Motors)Head Office ., V/S Vinaykumar S/o Basalingappa Navalagi

Royal Enfield  

Court Name: Bagalkot

Appelant Advocate S B Patil

Respondant Advocate

Sri S.B.P. Advocate filed Memo. Complainant and Respondent settled the matter. Hence not interested proceeds the case. Hence case is dismissed....

Case Number: 136

|

Date of Filing: 18-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 07-06-2017

Punjab

Amandeep V/S Royal Enfield

Royal Enfield  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Krishan Singla

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 260

|

Date of Filing: 18-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 25-04-2017

Madhya Pradesh

ANANAYA ROYAL ENFIELD V/S KAMLESH KUMAR CHAWLA

Royal Enfield  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 01-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 06-04-2017

Karnataka

1. Chairman and Managing Director Royal Enfield (A Unit of Eicher Motors Limited) V/S Sri. Raghavendra Krishna

Eicher Motors   Royal Enfield  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate SSM

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. CC/103/2013( Date of Filing : 03 Apr 2013 )1. Sri. Raghavendra Krishna A Research Scholar, aged about 27 years, S/o. Krishna NITK Surathkal, Mangalore...........Complainant(s)Versu...

Case Number: 103

|

Date of Filing: 03-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-12-2018

Haryana

The Manager Director Royal Enfield V/S Amarjeet S/o Satpal Singh

Royal Enfield  

Court Name: Sonipat

Appelant Advocate Satish Chander

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON’BLE PRESIDENT DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No. : CC/117 OF 2016 Instituted on : 25.04.2016 Date of order : 16.12.2016Amarjeet son of Shri Satpal Singh, resident of 173/27, Garhi Ghasita, behind Hindu Collage Sonipat.&hellip...

Case Number: 117

|

Date of Filing: 22-04-2016

|

Date of Upload: 27-03-2017

Rajasthan

Royal Enfield V/S Ankit Suhalka

Royal Enfield  

Court Name: Udaipur

Appelant Advocate Anjana Vyas

Respondant Advocate Praveen Khandelwal

Case Number: 341

|

Date of Filing: 19-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 06-12-2016

Gujarat

CEO.N.P Auto Agencies Royal Enfield V/S Osmangani Kasam Chavda

Royal Enfield  

Court Name: Kachchh

Appelant Advocate J M Ashar

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 05-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-01-2017

Punjab

Royal Enfield V/S Gurpreet Singh

Royal Enfield  

Court Name: Barnala

Appelant Advocate G.S.Dhaliwal

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/555/20161. Gurpreet SinghS/o Khushia Singh R/o Shiv Shakti Vatika Sanghera Road Colony BarnalaBarnalaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Royal Enfield1. Royal Enfield a unit of Motors Ltd Thiruvottiyur High Road, Thiruvotiyur Chenail thro...

Case Number: 555

|

Date of Filing: 10-06-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-09-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Royal Enfield in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Royal Enfield ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Royal Enfield under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.