company-name-logo

Royal Dutch Airlines

Latest Judgments

Total 19 Consumer Court Cases Against Royal Dutch Airlines.

Delhi

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines V/S Manoharlal Wadhwani

Royal Dutch Airlines  

Court Name: New Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002Case No.CC/32/2016 Dated:In the matter of: SH. MANOHARLAL WADHWANI,11/25, EAST PATEL NAGAR,NEW DELHI-110008. ……..COMPLAINANTVERSUSKL...

Case Number: 32

|

Date of Filing: 18-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-04-2017

NCDRC

M/S. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES V/S RAJEEV MALIK

Royal Dutch Airlines  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. FAISAL NASEEM & MR. RITESH PARSHAD

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 136 OF 20161. RAJEEV MALIKVILLAGE AND POST PHUGANA, TEHSIL BUDHANA,MUZAFFARNAGAR,U.P.-247776...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES(THROUGH ITS MD/ OFFICE INCHARGE) PRABHASH DEEP BU...

Case Number: 136

|

Date of Filing: 08-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 25-04-2016

Maharashtra

M/S. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES V/S MR. BERJIS MINOO DESAI AND ORS.

Royal Dutch Airlines  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 01-07-2005

|

Date of Upload: 11-12-2015

Chandigarh

Harmeet Singh V/S KLM Royal Dutch Airlines & anr.

Royal Dutch Airlines  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate A.R. Takkar, R.K. Goyal & Shubhankar Baweja

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHRevision Petition No.:37 of 2015Date of Institution:28.08.2015Date of Decision:31.08.2015KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, (Airport Office), Room No.2, 4th Floor, Level-1, I.G.I. Airport, Delhi, through its authorized person.KL...

Case Number: 37

|

Date of Filing: 28-08-2015

|

Date of Upload: 02-09-2015

NCDRC

VARUN KUMA TIWARI V/S KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES

Royal Dutch Airlines  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. AMIR SINGH PASRICH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2786 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/06/2012 in Appeal No. 141/2012 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINESThrough General Manager, 8th Floor, Tower C, Building No.8 DLF Cybe...

Case Number: 2786

|

Date of Filing: 27-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 13-08-2012

Chandigarh

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines V/S Pardeep Singh

Royal Dutch Airlines  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 16 of 2011 1. Pardeep SinghS/o Sh Jasbir Singh, R/o - Village - Dhakdana, P.O.-KuraliKhararPb2. Kulbir SinghS/o Sh Jagjit Singh, R/o Village-Santpur Chupki, P.O. Singh Bhagwantpur, Teh-RoparRoparPb3. Daljit Skingh S/o S...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 13-01-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Tamil Nadu

M/s KLM Royal Dutch Airlines V/S Appusamy Mahalingam

Royal Dutch Airlines  

Court Name: Coimbatore

Appelant Advocate M.Panchapakesan

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 08-04-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

KLM Royal dutch Airlines V/S Dr.Vangala Prabhakar Reddy

Royal Dutch Airlines  

Court Name: Hyderabad-III

Appelant Advocate M/s.G.Ramachandra Reddy

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 903

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-2006

|

Date of Upload: 25-03-2019

Telangana

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines V/S Rajani V. Reddy

Royal Dutch Airlines  

Court Name: Hyderabad-III

Appelant Advocate M/s.G.Rama Chandra Reddy

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 904

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-2006

|

Date of Upload: 25-03-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Royal Dutch Airlines in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Royal Dutch Airlines ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Royal Dutch Airlines under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.