Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Sibajisankar Dhar
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087RP No. 46 Of 2014(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/01/2014 in Case No. CC/622/2013 of District Kolkata-I)1. Toplight Commercial Ltd. 7A, Bentinck Street, Kolkata-700 001, represented thro...
Case Number: 46
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODEComplaint Case No. CC/2/20141. SUDHEERS/O SUKUMARAN, SRAMBIPARAMBIL HOUSE, WESTHILL(PO)KOZHIKODE-5...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PROPRIETOR/MANAGING PARTNER, SALKARA RESTAURANTKANNUR ROAD, VANDIPETTAKOZHIKODE-6.............
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N.B.KALANTRI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/08/110(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/11/2007 in Case No. 4/2005 of District None)1. NIDOZ RESTAURANT & BAR THROUGH...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/08/110(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/11/2007 in Case No. 4/2005 of District None)1. NIDOZ RESTAURANT & BAR THROUGH...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sudhir Makkar Adv.
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/8/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Lite Bite Foods Pvt. Ltd.Gurgaon BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH ...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv.
Respondant Advocate Adv.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Execution Application No. EA/11/641. Yuvraj S BobadeMire Layout, Umred Road,NagpurMaharashtra...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Shri Murlidhar Chavan, Sakka...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
United India Insurance Restaurant Insurance
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K. MARUTHI RAO & K. RADHA
Respondant Advocate MR HARSH KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1010 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 02/12/2011 in Appeal No. 913/2009 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. M/S. ABHIRUCHI RESTAURANTRep by its Sri S.V babu Reddy, H.no-7-274/4 DS Road, Secunderab...
Case Number: 1010
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2013
United India Insurance Restaurant Insurance
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K. MARUTHI RAO & K. RADHA
Respondant Advocate MR. HARSH KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1010 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 02/12/2011 in Appeal No. 913/2009 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. M/S. ABHIRUCHI RESTAURANTRep by its Sri S.V babu Reddy, H.no-7-274/4 DS Road, Secunderab...
Case Number: 1011
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2013
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 459 of 2012 1. Swarleen Kaur#257, BCW Surajpur, Tehsil Kalka, District Panchkula, D/o Late Sh. Satnam Singh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Kava R...
Case Number: 459
|
Date of Filing: 03-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate V. K. WASNIK
Respondant Advocate MADHAVI DAS
ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,मुंबई उपनगर जिल्हा, मुंबई.प्रशासकीय इमारत, 3 रा मजला, डॉ.बाबासाहेब आंबेडकर उद्या�...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Restaurant in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Restaurant ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Restaurant under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.