company-name-logo

Restaurant

Latest Judgments

Total 373 Consumer Court Cases Against Restaurant.

Rajasthan

Kanji Restaurant V/S Virendra Singh

Restaurant  

Court Name: Jaipur-IV

Appelant Advocate Avinash Pareek

Respondant Advocate Devendra Mohan Matur

Case Number: 472

|

Date of Filing: 21-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 12-03-2018

West Bengal

Arsalan Restaurant and Caterer, Prop. R.A.A.Arsalan Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. V/S Soumen Das

Restaurant  

Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)

Appelant Advocate Arindam Peyada

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/300/20171. Soumen Das1808, Naskarhat, Swarup Kalika Plac, P.S. Kasba, P.O.Tiljala, Kolkata-700039............Complainant(s)Versus1. Ars...

Case Number: 300

|

Date of Filing: 27-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 19-03-2018

Maharashtra

M/s Pooja Restaurant V/S The Manager, National insurance Co Ltd

National Insurance   Restaurant   Insurance  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S S Dwivedi

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 23-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 28-02-2018

Rajasthan

Cannught Plaza Restaurant V/S Surendra Singh

Restaurant  

Court Name: Jaipur-IV

Appelant Advocate Khem Chand Mahawar

Respondant Advocate Rajesh Jain

Case Number: 163

|

Date of Filing: 27-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 26-02-2018

Punjab

S.K.C. Anpurna Pure Veg Restaurant V/S Mandeep Kumar Gandhi

Restaurant  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Smt.Harmanpreet Kaur

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 266 Instituted on: 06.06.2017 Decided on: 02.02.2018Mandeep Kumar Gandhi son of Ram Kishan Gandhi, resident of Block-F, H.No.9, Officer Colony, Sangrur. …Complainant Versus1. S.K.C. Anpurna Pure Veg. Restau...

Case Number: 266

|

Date of Filing: 06-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 21-02-2018

Karnataka

The proprietr, Hotel Shiva Sangam.Sagar Sangam Bar & Restaurant V/S Mahantesh S/o Shivabasayya Hiremath

Restaurant   Hotel  

Court Name: Bagalkot

Appelant Advocate J N Kulkarni

Respondant Advocate M C Hiremath

Case Number: 95

|

Date of Filing: 13-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 31-01-2018

Haryana

RUSTIC DOOR RESTAURANT V/S MRS SANGEETA CHANDGOTHIA

Restaurant  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate PANKAJ CHANDGOTHIA

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Complaint Case No.:296 of 2017Date of Institution:15.12.2017Date of Decision:29.01.2018Mrs.Sangeeta Chandgotia w/o Sh.Pankaj Chandgotia, R/o H.No.204, Dahlia Block, Amravati Enclave, Panchkula. ….Complainan...

Case Number: 296

|

Date of Filing: 15-12-2017

|

Date of Upload: 30-01-2018

Chandigarh

Farmers Restaurant V/S Sahib Singh

Restaurant  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/194/2017Date of Institution:06/03/2017Date of Decision:19/12/2017Sahib Singh son of Late Shri Hari Singh, House No.2205/2, Sector 37-C, Chandigarh.……… Complainan...

Case Number: 194

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 08-01-2018

Karnataka

Mouddinsab.K.Hubballi, The Manager, Sainath Restaurant and Another V/S Department of Legal Metro logy, ACLM

Restaurant  

Court Name: Gadag

Appelant Advocate Inperson

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Behind Tahsildar Office, Basaveshwar Nagar, GADAGComplaint Case No. CC/74/20171. Department of Legal Metro logy, ACLMGadagGadagKarnataka...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Mouddinsab.K.Hubballi, The Manager, Sainath Restaurant and Another ...

Case Number: 74

|

Date of Filing: 24-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 01-12-2017

Maharashtra

The Manager, Panjab Grill Restaurant V/S Shri Jai Jeet Singh

Restaurant  

Court Name: Central Mumbai

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 03-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 23-11-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Restaurant in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Restaurant ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Restaurant under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.