Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUBODH K. PATHAK & B. PATNAIK
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 264 OF 20111. RAKESH JAIN & ANR............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EROS RESORTS & HOTELS PVT. LTD............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. S. K. NAIK, PRESIDING MEMBER For the Complainant :Mr. ...
Case Number: 264
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2011
Mahindra Holidays And Resorts Holidays Resorts
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv.S.J.kHARWADE
Respondant Advocate Adv.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/11/2091. Shri Sudhir Gajanan ShivdekarYogiraj Co-op. Housing Society, Amravati Road,NagpurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versu...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P.K.SATYANATHAN
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. U.R. DUBEY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3676 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 25/07/2008 in Appeal No. 567/2008 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. USHA LEXUS MANALI HOTELS & RESORTS PVT. LTD.18-19, Aditya Commercial Complex, Nangal RayaNew ...
Case Number: 3676
|
Date of Filing: 18-09-2008
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate U.R. DUBEY
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1348 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 03/01/2007 in Appeal No. 195/2006 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. USHA LEXUS (MANALI) HOTELS AND RESORTS PVT. LTD.18-19, Aditya Commercial Complex, Nangal Raya...
Case Number: 1348
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate U.R. DUBEY
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1349 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 03/01/2007 in Appeal No. 196/2006 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. USHA LEXUS (MANALI) HOTELS AND RESORTS PVT. LTD.18-19, Aditya Commercial Complex, Nangal Raya...
Case Number: 1349
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate U.R. DUBEY
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1350 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 03/01/2007 in Appeal No. 1274/2006 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. USHA LEXUS (MANALI) HOTELS AND RESORTS PVT. LTD.18-19, Aditya Commercial Complex, Nangal Ray...
Case Number: 1350
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate U.R. DUBEY
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1351 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 03/01/2007 in Appeal No. 1275/2006 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. USHA LEXUS (MANALI) HOTELS AND RESORTS PVT. LTD.18-19, Aditya Commercial Complex, Nangal Ray...
Case Number: 1351
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate U.R. DUBEY
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1352 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 03/01/2007 in Appeal No. 1276/2006 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. USHA LEXUS (MANALI) HOTELS AND RESORTS PVT. LTD.18-19, Aditya Commercial Complex, Nangal Ray...
Case Number: 1352
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate U.R. DUBEY
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1353 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 03/01/2007 in Appeal No. 1277/2006 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. USHA LEXUS (MANALI) HOTELS AND RESORTS PVT. LTD.18-19, Aditya Commercial Complex, Nangal Ray...
Case Number: 1353
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2011
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Resorts in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Resorts ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Resorts under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.