Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate K.Sivankutty Nair
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/13/1031. V. UshaBranch Manager,SBI,Vattiyoorkavu Branch...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Renault TrivandrumTVS&Sons Ltd.,Neeramankara,Kaimanam............Opp.Party(s) BEFO...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate V A Ajay
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. CC/14/242( Date of Filing : 08 May 2014 )1. Prabhakaran-...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Renault India Pvt Ltd.-............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MRS. Padmini Sudheesh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. SHEENA V V ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 11-11-2022
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate M.L.sharma
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/13/5221. Bhushan Kumar Singlason of sh. sita Ram r/o H.No.16717/2.st. No.6, Basant vihar, BathindaBathinda...........Complainant...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Adv.N R Bhavar
Respondant Advocate
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.Revision Petition No. RP/14/14(Arisen out of Order Dated 12/03/2014 in Case No. 125/2013 of District Parbhani)1. The Manager Renault AurangabadUnnati Vehicle Pvt. Ltd.Raja Bansilal Market ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 487
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. C.G.A. ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. TARUN K. BANGA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 102 OF 2014 IN CC/188/20101. ROHIT SHROFF & ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. RENAULT DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMB...
Case Number: 102
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2014
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/13/25881. M/s. Surgicare#7, 12th 'A' Main Road, Bandappa Garden, Muthyalnagar, Bangalore-560054, Rep by its Part...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/13/563( Date of Filing : 12 Sep 2013 )1. Manoj Kumar AgarwalP-124, CIT Road, Kolkata-700054.KolkataWB...........Complain...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2023
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARJUN GARG
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3255 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/05/2013 in Appeal No. 775/2013 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh) WITH IA/5735/2013,IA/5764/20131. SHIVANI TAWANIW/O. DR. OMPRAKASH TAWANI, 115 SANGHI STRE...
Case Number: 3255
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR.ARJAN SINGH SHERGILL (GP HOLDER)
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3205 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 27/05/2013 in Appeal No. 399/2013 & 268/2013 of the State Commission Punjab)1. JODHBIR SINGH SHERGILLS/O RANJEET SINGH, HOUSE NO-1097, SECTOR- 29-BCHANDIGARH..........
Case Number: 3205
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Renault in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Renault ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Renault under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.