company-name-logo

Renault

Latest Judgments

Total 346 Consumer Court Cases Against Renault.

Uttar Pradesh

RENAULT AJENCY, MOTER CAR V/S RAJENDRA PRASAD KESHARI S/O LATE PANNA LAL

Renault  

Court Name: Sonbhadra

Appelant Advocate RAVINDRA NATH PANDEY

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 58

|

Date of Filing: 01-04-2017

|

Date of Upload: 18-11-2017

Gujarat

RENAULT INDIA PVT V/S SHIDHARTH S. CHAUDHARI

Renault  

Court Name: Surat

Appelant Advocate PRITIBEN JOSI

Respondant Advocate A J SHAH/CHIRAG PATEL

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 26-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 03-01-2020

Punjab

Renault India Ltd. V/S Gurmeet Singh

Renault  

Court Name: Amritsar

Appelant Advocate S.S.Channa

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/16/1491. Gurmeet SinghL6/915, Near Shaheed Udham Singh Nagar, Bazar, no.4, Gali no.4, Tarn Taran Road, AmritsarTarn TaranPunjab...........Complainant(s)V...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 21-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 24-04-2017

Himachal Pradesh

Renault Kangra V/S Shivender Singh

Renault  

Court Name: Kangra

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 171

|

Date of Filing: 22-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 10-04-2017

Himachal Pradesh

Renault V/S Shashi Kant

Renault  

Court Name: Kangra

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 175

|

Date of Filing: 13-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 10-04-2017

Punjab

M/s Renault India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Vijay Kumar

Renault  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Suvir Kumar

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 908

|

Date of Filing: 17-08-2015

|

Date of Upload: 10-04-2017

Chandigarh

The Executive Director, Sales and Marketing, Renault India Pvt. Ltd., V/S Paramjit Singh Brar

Renault  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Dinesh Kumar Ganga Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Dated :27/02/2017ORDER Sh. D.K. Ganga, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh complaint. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complaina...

Case Number: 155

|

Date of Filing: 13-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 01-03-2017

Delhi

RENAULT DELHI SOUTH SPRINT CARST PVT LTD V/S SURENDER SINGH

Renault  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. cc/122/20131. SURENDER SINGH53 SAIDULAJAIB PO-MEHRAULI NEW DELHI 110030...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RENAULT DELHI SOUTH SPRINT CARST PVT...

Case Number: 122

|

Date of Filing: 11-03-2003

|

Date of Upload: 19-12-2016

Jharkhand

Renault India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Rakesh Kumar Bhadani

Renault  

Court Name: Purbi Singhbhum

Appelant Advocate Mr. Bishnu Kant Ojha

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/133/2015( Date of Filing : 31 Dec 2015 )1. Rakesh Kumar Bhadani H.No-125, Bhuiyandih , Wood Stall, P.O. Agrico, P.S. Sitaramdera, Jamshedpur Purbi SinghbhumJharkhand...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Renault India Pvt. Ltd.4th Floor, A.S.V. Ra...

Case Number: 133

|

Date of Filing: 31-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 18-09-2019

Karnataka

The Managing Director, Renault India Pvt.Ltd., V/S R.H.Raju S/o. R.Ranganath

Renault  

Court Name: Chitradurga

Appelant Advocate Shri.N.S.Shamsundr

Respondant Advocate Exparte

COMPLAINT FILED ON:01.02.2016DISPOSED ON:25.11.2016BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHITRADURGA.CC.NO: 6/2016DATED: 25th NOVEMBER 2016PRESENT: - SRI. T.N. SREENIVASAIAH : PRESIDENT B.A., LL.B., SRI. N.THIPPESWAMY MEMBER B.A., LL.B., ……COMPLAI...

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 01-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Renault in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Renault ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Renault under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.