Reena
Latest Judgments
Total 641 Consumer Court Cases Against Reena.
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2016
S.M.RAFIK V/S REENA BHANDARI
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate ASHISH MATHUR
Respondant Advocate A.A.KHAN
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/99/20141. REENA BHANDARIJODHPUR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. S.M.RAFIKJODHPUR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:JUDGES SATYA DEO TAK PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. SURENDRA SINGH CHOUHAN MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. ZUBEDA QUADRI MEMBER For the Complainant:For ...
Case Number: 99
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2015
ALLAHABAD BANK V/S REENA
Court Name: Mahoba
Appelant Advocate G.L.PANDEY
Respondant Advocate VEERENDRA TRIPATHI
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 48/20131. REENAKULPAHAR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ALLAHABAD BANKKULPAHAR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Mr. BABULAL YADAV PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. SIDDHESHWAR AWASTHI MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. NEELA MISHRA MEMBER For the Complain...
Case Number: 48
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2015
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. V/S REENA KANSAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NAVEEN KUMAR CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate MR. MAIBAM N. SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2957 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 26/04/2012 in Appeal No. 1194/2008 of the State Commission Punjab)1. REENA KANSALR/o 83 The Mall Civil Lines Ludhiana Punjab...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. UNITED ...
Case Number: 2957
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2014
REENA BEN PATEL V/S RASHMIBHAI BABUBHAI MISTRI
Court Name: Vadodara
Appelant Advocate SIMA CHATURVEDI
Respondant Advocate
CDRF VADODARA MAINANAND NAGAR,KARELIBAUG,VADODARAComplaint Case No. CC/13/541. RASHMIBHAI BABUBHAI MISTRI WAGHODIYA ROAD VADODARA BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE P.O.LAD PRESIDENT MRS. KAMAL P. SHAH MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERDISPOSED OFF [HON'ABLE MR. JUSTI...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
DR. MEENAKSHI MISHRA ,JHA HOSPITAL & ANR. V/S SMT. REENA BANSAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. R.R. & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. OM PRAKASH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 878 OF 2012 IN OP/317/20021. SMT. REENA BANSAL...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DR. MEENAKSHI MISHRA ,JHA HOSPITAL & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHOKE,...
Case Number: 878
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2014
Smt. Reena Choudhary V/S Superintendent of post offices and others
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. C. K. Jha
Respondant Advocate Mr. Panch Deo Singh
Case Number: 103
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 25-08-2022
REENA SINGH & ANR. V/S MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
Life Insurance Life Insurance Reena Max
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. D. VARADARAJAN
Respondant Advocate MR. NIRMAL SINGH JAGDEVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2394 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 21/03/2013 in Appeal No. 17/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh) WITH IA/3976/20131. MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.THRO ITS BRANCH MANAGER, SC) 36...
Case Number: 2394
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-08-2014
REENA SINGH & ANR. V/S MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
Life Insurance Life Insurance Reena Max
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. D. VARADARAJAN
Respondant Advocate MR. NIRMAL SINGH JAGDEVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2394 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 21/03/2013 in Appeal No. 17/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh) WITH IA/3976/20131. MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.THRO ITS BRANCH MANAGER, SC) 36...
Case Number: 2395
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-08-2014
Reena S., D/o. K.P. Raghurama Shetty V/S The Principal, St. Aloysius College
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P.D Souza
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 699
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-06-2023
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Reena in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Reena ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Reena under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.