Reebok
Latest Judgments
Total 97 Consumer Court Cases Against Reebok.
M/s Reebok India V/S Hukam Chand Suri
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Vijay Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
None has turned up on behalf of complainant. Case has been called several times since morning. It is already 1.00 pm. Hence, there is no other option but to dismiss the complaint in default for want of prosecution. It is ordered accordingly. Certified copy be sent to the parties,...
Case Number: 512
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-07-2017
Reebok West Wind Retails V/S Sunil Kapoor
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate By Post
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 337
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-06-2017
M/s. Reebok India Company V/S Ajay Gupta
Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali
Appelant Advocate D.R. Kaith
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/459/20161. Ajay GuptaS/o Sh. Tarsem Kumar Gupta, R/o H.no.1260, Sector 42-B, Chandigarh............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s. Reebok India CompanyThrough its Managing Director, Signature Tower-B, South City 1, Gurgaon Haryana 122001.2. M/s R...
Case Number: 459
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
M/s Reebok India V/S Nitin Suri
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Vijay Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :02/05/2017ORDER Sh. Vijay Goyal, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws the complaint with liberty to file afresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would ...
Case Number: 384
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2017
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2017
Shop Manager, Reebok Basic Clothing Pvt. Ltd. V/S Pooja Gupta
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:102 of 2017Date of Institution:3.2.2017Date of Decision:10.4.2017Pooja Gupta wife of Nikhil Gupta resident of 8229C, 1st floor, Sector 125, New Sunny Enclave, Kharar. ……&h...
Case Number: 102
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-04-2017
Reebok West Wind Retails V/S Sunil Kapoor
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate compl.in person
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA. Complaint No: 58 of 20.01.2016. Date of Decision: 03.03.2017.Sunil Kapoor son of Sh. Ram Nath Kapoor, resident of Block-1, House No.631/09, Kundanpuri, Civil Lines, Ludhiana-141001. ..… Complainant VersusRe...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2017
Reebok India Company V/S Sri Bijit Borah
Court Name: Sonitpur
Appelant Advocate Mr Kishore Deka
Respondant Advocate Mr Abhijit Kar
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-11-2017
Shop Manager, Reebok Basic Clothing Pvt. Ltd., V/S Tajbir Kaur
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Simranjeet Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :08/02/2017ORDER Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of OP. Sh. Simranjeet Singh, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that in view of the compromise between the parties, he withdraws this complaint. In view of the aforesaid st...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Reebok India Company V/S Munish Bansal
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Kunal Garg Adv. & Shama Adv.
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 619 OF 2016Munish Bansal Vs Reebok India Company and Anr. BEFORE: HON’BLE MR. RAJAN DEWAN PRESIDENT HON’BLE MRS. PRITI MALHOTRA, MEMBER HON’BLE MR. RAVINDER SINGH, MEMBER PRE...
Case Number: 619
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Reebok in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Reebok ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Reebok under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.