Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rahul Bedi Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:477/2017Date of Institution :19.06.2017Date of Decision :09.10.2017Harpreet s/o Anil Kumar r/o H.No.2269, Sector 23-C, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersusADI Sports Adidas Shop No.18, Ground Fl...
Case Number: 477
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-10-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Simranjeet Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:18/2017Date of Institution :04.01.2017Date of Decision :09.10.2017Apinder Singh son of Sh.Jasmer Singh r/o H.No.446, Sector 20, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersusShop Manager, Reebok Basic Clo...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-10-2017
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Sh PS Walia
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,PatialaPatialaComplaint Case No. CC/17/246( Date of Filing : 28 Jun 2017 )1. Sonia Bhasinw/o Nardeep Singh Bhasin FlatNo.641 Ats Flats Dera Basi Mohalipunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ReebokBasic clothin Pvt Ltdshop No.26 Bhupindr...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2018
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Simranjeet Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/361/2017Date of Institution:26/04/2017Date of Decision:15/09/2017Nikhil Gupta son of Radheshyam Gupta resident of 8229C, 1st Floor, Sector 125, New Sunny Enclave, Kharar.…..ComplainantV ...
Case Number: 361
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:453 of 2017Date of Institution:06.06.2017Date of Decision:10.08.2017Maneet Singh son of Sh.Harbir Singh r/o House No.3129, Sector 21-D, Chandigarh …..ComplainantVersusReebok, Basic Clothin...
Case Number: 453
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gaurajit Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate Manoj Lakhotia,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:90/2017Date of Institution:27.12.2016Date of Decision:02.08.2017Jasbir Kaur w/o Sh.Apinder Singh r/o H.No.446, Sector 20, Chandigarh …..ComplainantVersusShop Manager, Reebok Basic Clothing P...
Case Number: 90
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Gupta Adv. & Shama Adv.
Respondant Advocate Manoj Lakhotia,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:88/2017Date of Institution :24.01.2017Date of Decision :02.08.2017Kunal Garg, Advocate r/o #1001, Sector 4, Panchkula. …..ComplainantVersusReebok India Company, through its Director/Authoriz...
Case Number: 88
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Simranjeet Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:60/2017Date of Institution :17.01.2017Date of Decision :02.08.2017Teginder Singh Randhawa s/o Apinder Singh r/o H.No.446, Sector 20, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersusShop Manager, Reebok Basi...
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. Vikas Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:98/2017Date of Institution:27.01.2017Date of Decision:26.07.2017Simranjeet Singh son of Iqbal Singh r/o H.No.815, Sector 16,Chandigarh …..ComplainantVersusShop Manager, Reebok Basic Clothing...
Case Number: 98
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Mayur Kanwar
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/341/2017Date of Institution:20/04/2017Date of Decision:21/07/2017Ajay Arora S/o Sh. V.K. Arora, R/o H.No.307, Sector 16, Panchkula.……… Complainant.VersusREEBOK, ...
Case Number: 341
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Reebok in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Reebok ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Reebok under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.