company-name-logo

Reebok

Latest Judgments

Total 97 Consumer Court Cases Against Reebok.

Punjab

Reebok Adisports India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Bhupinder Singh Matharoo

Reebok  

Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali

Appelant Advocate Brijesh Khosla

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/221/20171. Bhupinder Singh MatharooS/o Resham Singh R/o Plot No.114, Industrial Area, Phase 1, Chandigarh............Complainant(s)Versus1. Reebok Adisports India Pvt. Ltd.GF 001, ff-40,41,42,43,44, Cosmo Plaza, NH 22, MOhali Zirakpur, throug...

Case Number: 221

|

Date of Filing: 20-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 07-03-2018

Chandigarh

Reebok India Company V/S Kunal Garg, Advocate

Reebok  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Adv. Gaurav Gupta & Shama

Respondant Advocate

The complainant has appended a note on the execution application itself that he withdraws the execution application as he has received the payment from the OPs. In view of the aforesaid statement, this execution application under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 19...

Case Number: 213

|

Date of Filing: 14-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 17-01-2018

Punjab

Reebok Adisports India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Shiti Dutt

Reebok  

Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali

Appelant Advocate Ranjodh Singh Dhillon

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/244/20171. Shiti DuttW/o Gautam Dutt, R/o H.No. 2163, Sector 21-C, Chandigarh............Complainant(s)Versus1. Reebok Adisports India Pvt. Ltd.GF 001, FF-40,41,42,43,44, Cosmo Plaza, NH-22, Moahli, Zirakpur through its Proprietor/Manager/Aut...

Case Number: 244

|

Date of Filing: 24-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 12-01-2018

Chandigarh

Adi Sports Reebok V/S Tushar Walia

Reebok   Sports  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Harpreet Saini Adv.

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:607/2017Date of Institution :10.08.2017Date of Decision :01.12.2017Tushar Walia s/o Ashok Walia r/o H.No.398, Saini Vihar, Phase-I, Baltana, Mohali, Punjab. …..ComplainantVersusADI Sports Re...

Case Number: 607

|

Date of Filing: 10-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 11-12-2017

Chandigarh

Reebok V/S Gautam Dutt

Reebok  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:291 of 2017Date of Institution:28.11.2017Date of Decision:30.11.2017Gautam Dutt S/o Late Sh.S.K.Dutt, Resident of H.No.2163, Sector 21-C, Chandigarh.……Appellant/Complainant.VersusReebok, Basic C...

Case Number: 291

|

Date of Filing: 28-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 01-12-2017

Punjab

Reebok V/S Sehaj Bhasin

Reebok  

Court Name: Patiala

Appelant Advocate Sh. P.S. Walia

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,PatialaPatialaComplaint Case No. CC/17/275( Date of Filing : 18 Jul 2017 )1. Sehaj Bhasind/o Nardeep Bhasin r/o Flat No.641 ATS flats Dera Bassi Mohalipunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ReebokBasic clothing pvt ltd shop No 26 Bhupin...

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 18-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 21-06-2018

Punjab

Reebok V/S Ram Lal

Reebok  

Court Name: Patiala

Appelant Advocate Sh P S Walia

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,PatialaPatialaComplaint Case No. CC/17/261( Date of Filing : 10 Jul 2017 )1. Ram Lals/o Sh Neeru Ram r/o 106 G Street No 3 Partap Nagar PatialapatialaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ReebokShop No.26 Ground floor Bhupindra Road Pa...

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 10-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 21-06-2018

Punjab

Reebok Basic cloths V/S Sonia Bhasin

Reebok  

Court Name: Patiala

Appelant Advocate P.S.Walia

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,PatialaPatialaComplaint Case No. CC/17/260( Date of Filing : 10 Jul 2017 )1. Sonia Bhasind/o Nardeep Singh Bhasin Plot No. 641 AIS FlatsNear Bassi Mohali Punjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Reebok Basic clothsShop No,26 Bhupindra Roa...

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 10-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 21-06-2018

Chandigarh

Reebok ADI Sports V/S Satish Kumar Bansal

Reebok   Sports  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Shailendra Sharma Adv.

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:405/2017Date of Institution:11.05.2017Date of Decision:20.11.2017Satish Kumar Bansal s/o Sh.Ram Kumar Bansal r/o Flat No.18, GH-37, Sector 20, Panchkula. …..ComplainantVersus1. Reebok ADI Sp...

Case Number: 405

|

Date of Filing: 11-05-2017

|

Date of Upload: 01-12-2017

Chandigarh

Reebok India Company V/S Vishwadeep Kaur

Reebok  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Amandeep Singh Nirmaan Adv.

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:520/2017Date of Institution:20.07.2017Date of Decision:12.10.2017Vishwadeep Kaur d/o S.Narinder Singh r/o H.No.2489, Phase-II, Urban Estate Patiala. …..ComplainantVersus1. Reebok India Compa...

Case Number: 520

|

Date of Filing: 10-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 02-11-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Reebok in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Reebok ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Reebok under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.