Raymond
Latest Judgments
Total 441 Consumer Court Cases Against Raymond.
Manager/Authorised Person,Pushpa Enterprise, The Raymond Shop V/S Subal Kumar Mitra
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate Ld. Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II.8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/249/20141. Subal Kumar Mitra38/1C,Pramanick Ghat Road, P.S. Cossipore, Kolkata-700 036............Complainant(s)Versus1. Manager/Authorised Pers...
Case Number: 249
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Roayl Exchange (India) V/S Henry Rapahel D Souza, S/o. Raymond D Souza
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Sri. s. Nagabhushana
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/13/6481. Henry Rapahel D Souza, S/o. Raymond D Souza Residing at No. B -202, Nakshtra Apartment 7th cross, Linga...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SQUARE ENTERPRISES THROUGH MR.YUSUFNOOR M.KHAN V/S RAYMOND JOHN GONSALVES
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate PRAKASH R.HEGDE
Respondant Advocate Mr. Manoj P. Mhatre
ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,मुंबई उपनगर जिल्हा, मुंबई.प्रशासकीय इमारत, 3 रा मजला, डॉ.बाबासाहेब आंबेडकर उद्या�...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
RAYMOND SHOP & OTHERS V/S DR. ASOK MUKHOPADHYAY
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
cause list8B,Nelie Sengupta Sarani,7th Floor,Kolkata-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/336/2012 1. DR. ASOK MUKHOPADHYAY 4-B, BISWAS NURSERY LANE, P.S. BELGACHIA, KOLKATA-700085. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. RAYMOND SHOP & OTHERSP-154/B, C.I.T. SCHEME-VII-M, ULTADANGA, KOLKATA-700...
Case Number: 336
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Managing Director,Kerala Water Authority and other V/S Raymond Antony,Sinai,Sakthikulangara.PO,Kollam
Court Name: Kollam
Appelant Advocate T.R.Vinod
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Civil Station,KollamKeralaComplaint Case No. CC/08/2521. Raymond Antony,Sinai,Sakthikulangara.PO,KollamKollamKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Managing Director,Kerala Water Authority and otherJalabhavan,ThiruvananthapuramKerala2. Execu...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 15-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Raymond Ltd V/S Ashutosh Agarwal
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2524
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2022
M.s New India Assurance Co.Ltd V/S Raymond Albert D Souza
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. CC/303/2010( Date of Filing : 08 Nov 2010 )1. Raymond Albert D SouzaYelahanka, Bangalore...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M.s New India Assurance Co.LtdMangalore, rep. by Managing ...
Case Number: 303
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2019
RAYMOND WOOLEN MILLS LTD. V/S CALCUTTA EXPRESS ROADLINES (P) LTD. & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R.K. SINGH & MS. AAKRITI JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 454 OF 1996(Against the Order dated null in Complaint No. of the State Commission Maharastra)1. CALCUTTA EXPRESS ROADLINES (P) LTD. & ANR.-...........Appellant(s)Versus1. RAYMOND WOOLEN MILLS LTD.-............
Case Number: 454
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-1996
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2010
Raymond Shop V/S M. Mohammed Amjad
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009consumer case(CC) No. CD/2003/142 M. Mohammed Amjad ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Raymond Shop ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Complainant(s)/A...
Case Number: 2003
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2003
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Labh Textorium Raymond Retail Shop V/S Pradip Vasudev Bhagvani
Court Name: Rajkot
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 98
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-1998
|
Date of Upload: 20-02-2021
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raymond in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raymond ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Raymond under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.