Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 1101 OF 2016Jaswinder Kaur Vs Shop Manager, Park Avenue BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Rohit Sharma, Counsel for Complainant.Sh.Simranjeet Singh, ...
Case Number: 1101
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 1097 OF 2016Jaswant SinghVs Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Limited BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Rohit Sharma, Counsel for Complainan...
Case Number: 1097
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Jasjit Singh Saini Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :28/12/2016ORDER Heard. Be registered. Admit. Notice. Sh. Simranjeet Singh, counsel for the OP has appeared and filed his Vakalatnama. Compromise deed (annexure Z) has been filed. Sh. Jasjit Singh counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the comp...
Case Number: 1043
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Mohit Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :28/12/2016ORDER Heard. Be registered. Admit. Notice. Sh. Simranjeet Singh, counsel for the OP has appeared and filed his Vakalatnama. Compromise deed (annexure Z) has been filed. Sh. Jasjit Singh counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the comp...
Case Number: 1044
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rahul Verma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :28/12/2016ORDER Heard. Be registered. Admit. Notice. Sh. Simranjeet Singh, counsel for the OP has appeared and filed his Vakalatnama. Compromise deed (annexure Z) has been filed. Sh. Arjun Grover, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the com...
Case Number: 1047
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rahul Verma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :28/12/2016ORDER Heard. Be registered. Admit. Notice. Sh. Simranjeet Singh, counsel for the OP has appeared and filed his Vakalatnama. Compromise deed (annexure Z) has been filed. Sh. Arjun Grover, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the com...
Case Number: 1048
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Arjun Grover Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :28/12/2016ORDER Heard. Be registered. Admit. Notice. Sh. Simranjeet Singh, counsel for the OP has appeared and filed his Vakalatnama. Compromise deed (annexure Z) has been filed. Sh. Arjun Grover, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the com...
Case Number: 1049
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Court Name: Karimnagar
Appelant Advocate K.Laxman Kumar
Respondant Advocate K.Sanjeevareddy
Case Number: 167
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Dated :26/10/2016ORDER Sh. Simranjeet Singh, counsel for the OPs has appeared and filed his Vakalatnama. Copy of the compromise annexure Z has been filed on behalf of the parties. Sh. R.C. Nayyar, complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that in view of...
Case Number: 676
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Harpreet Saini
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 636 OF 2016Anil Kumar Vs Raymond Apparel Limited Park AvenueBEFORE: DR.MANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Harpreet Saini, Counsel for Complainan...
Case Number: 636
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raymond in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raymond ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Raymond under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.