Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rohit Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :16/03/2017ORDER Heard. Be registered. Admit. Notice. Sh. Simranjeet Singh, counsel for the OP has appeared and filed his Vakalatnama. Sh. Rahul Verma, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that in view of the Annexure Z, he wit...
Case Number: 252
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rohit Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-IIU.T. ChandigarhFINAL ORDERComplaint Case No. CC/253/20171. Aditya Gautamson of S.D. Gautam resident of House Number 135, sector 1, Ambala City, Haryana............Complainant(s)Versus1. Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Limite...
Case Number: 253
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rohit Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :16/03/2017ORDER Heard. Be registered. Admit. Notice. Sh. Simranjeet Singh, counsel for the OP has appeared and filed his Vakalatnama. Sh. Rahul Verma, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that in view of the Annexure Z, he wit...
Case Number: 254
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gauravjit Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :16/03/2017ORDER Heard. Be registered. Admit. Notice. Sh. Simranjeet Singh, counsel for the OP has appeared and filed his Vakalatnama. Sh. Rahul Verma, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that in view of the Annexure Z, he wit...
Case Number: 255
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rohit Sharma
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IFinal OrderComplaint Case No. CC/211/20171. Aditya Gautam s/o S.D. Gautam r/o H.No. 135, Sec 1, Ambala City, Haryana............Complainant(s)Versus1. Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Ltd.S.No. 10, GF-10, R. Gandhi ...
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Ramandeep Singh
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IFinal OrderComplaint Case No. CC/212/20171. Aditya Gautams/o S.D. Gautam r/o H.No. 135, Sec 1, Ambala City, Haryana............Complainant(s)Versus1. Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparael Ltd.S.No. 10, GF-10, R. Gandhi ...
Case Number: 212
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rohit Sharma
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IFinal OrderComplaint Case No. CC/213/20171. Aditya Gautams/o S.D. Gautam r/o H.No. 135, Sec 1, Ambala City, Haryana............Complainant(s)Versus1. Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Ltd.S.No. 10, GF-10, R. Gandhi T...
Case Number: 213
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rohit Sharma
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IFinal OrderComplaint Case No. CC/214/20171. Aditya Gautam s/o S.D. Gautam r/o H.No. 135, Sec 1, Ambala City, Haryana............Complainant(s)Versus1. Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Ltd.S.No. 10, GF-10, R. Gandhi ...
Case Number: 214
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Gauravjit Singh
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IFinal OrderComplaint Case No. CC/215/20171. Apinder Singhs/o of Jasmer Singh r/o 446, Sector 20, Chandigarh............Complainant(s)Versus1. Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Ltd.S.No. 10, GF-10, R. Gandhi Tech. Par...
Case Number: 215
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Jagjit singh
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IFinal OrderComplaint Case No. CC/216/20171. Harpreet Singhs/o of Jaswant Singh r/o H.No. 300 Green Valley Sarangpur, U.T Chandigarh............Complainant(s)Versus1. Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Ltd.S.No. 10, GF...
Case Number: 216
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raymond in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raymond ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Raymond under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.