Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTIRCT Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh CC/ 509 /2017Amit Vs. Shop Manager, Park Avenue BEFORE: HON’BLE MR. RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT HON’BLE MRS. PRITI MALHOTRA, MEMBER Hon’ble MR. RAVINDER SINGH , MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Gouravdeep Goel, couns...
Case Number: 509
|
Date of Filing: 03-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-07-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTIRCT Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh CC/ 510/2017Amit Vs. Shop Manager, Park Avenue BEFORE: HON’BLE MR. RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT HON’BLE MRS. PRITI MALHOTRA, MEMBER Hon’ble MR. RAVINDER SINGH , MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Gouravdeep Goel, counse...
Case Number: 510
|
Date of Filing: 03-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-07-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Saurabh Gulia Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Simranjeet Singh, counsel for OPs has filed his vakalatnama and joined the proceedings at this stage. He has stated that the matter has been compromised. Learned counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that compromise of Rs.3000/- ha...
Case Number: 398
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-07-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 475 OF 2017Gurjent Singh Kashyap Vs Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Limited BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER PRITI MALHOTRA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.G.D.Goel, Counsel for Complainant....
Case Number: 475
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-07-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 476 OF 2017Teginder Singh Randhawa Vs Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Limited BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER PRITI MALHOTRA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.G.D.Goel, Counsel for Complainan...
Case Number: 476
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-07-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 477 OF 2017Teginder Singh Randhawa Vs Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Limited BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER PRITI MALHOTRA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.G.D.Goel, Counsel for Complainan...
Case Number: 477
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-07-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 478 OF 2017Teginder Singh Randhawa Vs Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Limited BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER PRITI MALHOTRA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.G.D.Goel, Counsel for Complainan...
Case Number: 478
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-07-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 474 OF 2017Iqbal Singh Vs Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Limited BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER PRITI MALHOTRA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.G.D.Goel, Counsel for Complainant.Sh.Simranj...
Case Number: 474
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-07-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Heard. Be registered. Admit. Notice. Sh. Simranjeet Singh, advocate has accepted the notice on behalf of OP. Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of OP. Learned counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that compromise of Rs.3000/- has bee...
Case Number: 488
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Heard. Be registered. Admit. Notice. Sh. Simranjeet Singh, advocate has accepted the notice on behalf of OP. Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of OP. Learned counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that compromise of Rs.3000/- has bee...
Case Number: 489
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raymond in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raymond ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Raymond under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.