Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Vikas Goyal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 603 OF 2017Nikhil Gupta Vs Shop Manager, DT-Mall, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Limited BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.G.D.Goel, Counsel for Compla...
Case Number: 603
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-IIU.T. ChandigarhFINAL ORDERComplaint Case No. CC/652/20171. Harpreet Singhs/o of Jaswant Singh r/o H.No. 300 Green Valley Sarangpur, U.T. Chandigarh............Complainant(s)Versus1. Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel LimitedS.N...
Case Number: 652
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-IIU.T. ChandigarhFINAL ORDERComplaint Case No. CC/653/20171. Harpreet Singhs/o of Jaswant Singh r/o H.No. 300 Green Valley Sarangpur, U.T. Chandigarh............Complainant(s)Versus1. Shop Manager, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel LimitedS.N...
Case Number: 653
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Heard. Be registered. Admit. Notice. Sh. Simranjeet Singh, advocate has accepted the notice on behalf of OP. Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of OP. Counsel for the OP has offered an amount of Rs.3000/- to the complainant, which shall be paid by the OP within 30 days from tod...
Case Number: 654
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Shiti Jain
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of OPs. Counsel for the OPs states at bar that the matter has been amicably settled and the OPs shall pay Rs.3000/- to the complainant within 45 days. In view of the compromise learned counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the...
Case Number: 549
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Apinder Singh
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 514 OF 2017Jasbir Kaur Vs Sales Person, Raymond Apparel Limited BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.G.D.Goel, Counsel for Complainant.Sh.Simranjeet Sin...
Case Number: 514
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Apinder Singh
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 520 OF 2017Lakhvinder Kaur Vs Sales Person, Raymond Apparel Limited BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.G.D.Goel, Counsel for Complainant.Sh.Simranjeet...
Case Number: 520
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Vikas Goyal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 522 OF 2017Gurjent Vs Shop Manager, DT-Mall, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Limited BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.G.D.Goel, Counsel for Complainant...
Case Number: 522
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar Goyal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 515 OF 2017Simranjit Singh Sandhu Vs Managing Director, PA (Park Avenue), Raymond Apparel Limited BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.G.D.Goel, Counsel...
Case Number: 515
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Vikas Goyal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 517 OF 2017Nikhil Gupta Vs Shop Manager, DT-Mall, Park Avenue, Raymond Apparel Limited BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.G.D.Goel, Counsel for Compla...
Case Number: 517
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raymond in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raymond ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Raymond under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.