Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2241 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 22/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1039/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. COMMISSIONER RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR.Jyoti NagarJaipurRajasthan2. Dy Commissoner Rajas...
Case Number: 2241
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.K. SINHA
Respondant Advocate MR. PUNEET SHARMA & SABYASACHI MISHRA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2871 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 14/06/2011 in Appeal No. 2173/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN KHADI & GRAMUDHYOG BOARD & ANR.Lal Baiwa AAO, Jaawhar lal Nehru MargJaipur Rajasth...
Case Number: 2871
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 810 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 11/07/2011 in Appeal No. 1995/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. CHAIRMAN, RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & 3 ORS.Jyoti Nagar SchemeJaipurRajasthan...........Petitio...
Case Number: 810
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KAMAL CHAMARIA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1246 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 16/08/2010 in Appeal No. 740/2005 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAKESH SINGHRESIDENT OF RAYSIS, TEHSIL NADBAL BHARATPUR...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. RAJAS...
Case Number: 1246
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 10-12-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. MANISH AMBWANI AND MS. CHARU AMBWANI
Respondant Advocate MR. N.K. CHAUHAN & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2661 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 15/07/2011 in Appeal No. 1405/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. NIRMALA BHARGAVAW/o Shri Prakash Chand Bhargav, R/o-18, Manu MargAlwar Rajasthan...........P...
Case Number: 2661
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. IMTIAZ AHMED & KAMRAN MALIK
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 794 OF 2012 IN RP/2856/20111. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. MAHESH CHANDRA AGARWAL...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEM...
Case Number: 794
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-11-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BADRIDAS SHARMA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 630 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 29/11/1995 in Complaint No. 22/1994 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDSECRETARY, RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD, JYOTI NAGAR, JAIPUR...........Appellant(s)Ve...
Case Number: 630
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-1996
|
Date of Upload: 23-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2128 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 28/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1656/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR.Through Chief Exectuive Engineer-II, Jyoti NagarJaipurRajastha...
Case Number: 2128
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURIMA TATIA
Respondant Advocate MR. RAJIV SHARMA & MR. DINESH SABHARWAL MR. SAMIR RASTOGI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 229 OF 19971. M/S. RAJASTHAN ART EMPORIUMHeritage House., Umaid Bhawan Palace Road,Rae Ka BaghJodhpur - 342 006............Complainant(s)Versus1. KUWAIT AIRWAY & ORS.86, Veer Nariman Road,ChurchgateMumbai ...
Case Number: 229
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-1997
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2012
United India Insurance Rajasthan
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Raja Bahadur Singh Jain
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 694 of 2010 1. M/s Rajasthan Engitech Pvt. Ltd,# 20, Industrial Area, Phase-I, Chandigarh, through Shri Vipin Sharma its MD. ...........Appellant(s...
Case Number: 694
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Rajasthan in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Rajasthan ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Rajasthan under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.