Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN & MR. NIKHIL JAIN
Respondant Advocate MR. SANJEEV KUMAR VARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4038 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 07/08/2012 in Appeal No. 131/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT & INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. (RIICO) & ANR.Through it...
Case Number: 4038
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN & MR. NIKHIL JAIN
Respondant Advocate MR. SANJEEV KUMAR VARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4050 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 07/08/2012 in Appeal No. 132/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT & INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. (RIICO) & ANR.Through it...
Case Number: 4050
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK JAIN
Respondant Advocate EX-PARTE
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2539 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/04/2012 in Appeal No. 1147/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR.Through Secretary Jyoti NagarJaipurRajasthan2. Dt Housing Comm...
Case Number: 2539
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. IMTIAZ AHMED & KAMRAN MALIK
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 289 OF 2013 IN RP/2856/20111. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. MAHESH CHANDRA AGARWAL...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'...
Case Number: 289
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2462 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 03/05/2011 in Appeal No. 928/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDThrough Housing Commissioner, Rajasthan Housing Board, Vaishali NagarA...
Case Number: 2462
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2013
Housing Board Society Rajasthan
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR, MR. VINAY KUMAR MISHRA & MR. SHOVAN MISHRA
Respondant Advocate MR. JITENDRA MITRUCKA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3714 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 03/07/2009 in Appeal No. 862/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ORS.Through chairman Rajasthan Housing Boad. Jyoit Nagar JaipurRaja...
Case Number: 3714
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JITENDRA MITRUCKA
Respondant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR, MR. VINAY KUMAR MISHRA & MR. SHOVAN MISHRA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3951 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 03/07/2009 in Appeal No. 861/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MANSAROVAR MUSLIM WELFARE SOCIETY THROUGH SECRETARY SAYED SAADAT ALIThrough Secretary Sayed S...
Case Number: 3951
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DEVENDRA MOHAN MATHUR
Respondant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1075 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 12/05/2007 in Appeal No. 216/2004 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. UMA SHANKAR SAXENAS/O SH. GAURI SHANKAR SAXENA, 1/197, SWAMI VIVEKANAND NAGARKOTA - 324 010RA...
Case Number: 1075
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2008
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2206 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 24/01/2013 in Appeal No. 1785/2006 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. SADBHAV ARYAC-144 MANGAL MARG, BAPU NAGAR, OPP 12 SHOP, JAIPUR - 302015RAJASTHAN...........P...
Case Number: 2206
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3952 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/07/2012 in Appeal No. 1443/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDThrough Chairman Jaipur Office Jyoti Nagar,JAIPURRAJASTHAN..............
Case Number: 3952
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-08-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Rajasthan in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Rajasthan ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Rajasthan under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.