company-name-logo

Rajasthan

Latest Judgments

Total 2337 Consumer Court Cases Against Rajasthan.

NCDRC

M/S. NKM JEWELS PVT. LTD. V/S RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT & INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. (RIICO) & ANR.

Rajasthan  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN & MR. NIKHIL JAIN

Respondant Advocate MR. SANJEEV KUMAR VARMA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4038 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 07/08/2012 in Appeal No. 131/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT & INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. (RIICO) & ANR.Through it...

Case Number: 4038

|

Date of Filing: 22-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 01-10-2013

NCDRC

M/S. GEM EXCEL V/S RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT & INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. (RIICO) & ANR.

Rajasthan  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN & MR. NIKHIL JAIN

Respondant Advocate MR. SANJEEV KUMAR VARMA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4050 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 07/08/2012 in Appeal No. 132/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT & INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. (RIICO) & ANR.Through it...

Case Number: 4050

|

Date of Filing: 23-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 01-10-2013

NCDRC

V.V. HARIT V/S RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR.

Housing Board   Rajasthan  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK JAIN

Respondant Advocate EX-PARTE

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2539 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/04/2012 in Appeal No. 1147/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR.Through Secretary Jyoti NagarJaipurRajasthan2. Dt Housing Comm...

Case Number: 2539

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-09-2013

NCDRC

MAHESH CHANDRA AGARWAL V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

Rajasthan  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. IMTIAZ AHMED & KAMRAN MALIK

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 289 OF 2013 IN RP/2856/20111. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. MAHESH CHANDRA AGARWAL...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'...

Case Number: 289

|

Date of Filing: 27-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 16-09-2013

NCDRC

PREM DEVI V/S RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD

Housing Board   Rajasthan  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2462 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 03/05/2011 in Appeal No. 928/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDThrough Housing Commissioner, Rajasthan Housing Board, Vaishali NagarA...

Case Number: 2462

|

Date of Filing: 21-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-08-2013

NCDRC

MANSAROVAR MUSLIM WELFARE SOCIETY V/S RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ORS.

Housing Board   Society   Rajasthan  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR, MR. VINAY KUMAR MISHRA & MR. SHOVAN MISHRA

Respondant Advocate MR. JITENDRA MITRUCKA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3714 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 03/07/2009 in Appeal No. 862/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ORS.Through chairman Rajasthan Housing Boad. Jyoit Nagar JaipurRaja...

Case Number: 3714

|

Date of Filing: 05-10-2009

|

Date of Upload: 12-09-2013

NCDRC

RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD&ORS V/S MANSAROVAR MUSLIM WELFARE SOCIETY THROUGH SECRETARY SAYED SAADAT ALI

Society   Rajasthan  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. JITENDRA MITRUCKA

Respondant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR, MR. VINAY KUMAR MISHRA & MR. SHOVAN MISHRA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3951 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 03/07/2009 in Appeal No. 861/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MANSAROVAR MUSLIM WELFARE SOCIETY THROUGH SECRETARY SAYED SAADAT ALIThrough Secretary Sayed S...

Case Number: 3951

|

Date of Filing: 23-10-2009

|

Date of Upload: 12-09-2013

NCDRC

RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD V/S UMA SHANKAR SAXENA

Housing Board   Rajasthan  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DEVENDRA MOHAN MATHUR

Respondant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1075 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 12/05/2007 in Appeal No. 216/2004 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. UMA SHANKAR SAXENAS/O SH. GAURI SHANKAR SAXENA, 1/197, SWAMI VIVEKANAND NAGARKOTA - 324 010RA...

Case Number: 1075

|

Date of Filing: 11-03-2008

|

Date of Upload: 12-09-2013

NCDRC

RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR. V/S SADBHAV ARYA

Housing Board   Rajasthan  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2206 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 24/01/2013 in Appeal No. 1785/2006 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. SADBHAV ARYAC-144 MANGAL MARG, BAPU NAGAR, OPP 12 SHOP, JAIPUR - 302015RAJASTHAN...........P...

Case Number: 2206

|

Date of Filing: 29-05-2013

|

Date of Upload: 05-09-2013

NCDRC

VINAY KUMAR GOYAL V/S RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD

Housing Board   Rajasthan  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3952 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/07/2012 in Appeal No. 1443/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDThrough Chairman Jaipur Office Jyoti Nagar,JAIPURRAJASTHAN..............

Case Number: 3952

|

Date of Filing: 16-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 23-08-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Rajasthan in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Rajasthan ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Rajasthan under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.