Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3820 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 10/06/2013 in Appeal No. 173/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan) WITH IA/6774/2013,IA/6775/20131. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDTHROUGH PRESIDENT, JYOTI NAGAR,JAIPURR...
Case Number: 3820
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4419 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 24/07/2013 in Appeal No. 477/2013 of the State Commission Rajasthan) WITH IA/7170/2013,IA/7171/20131. RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.THROUG...
Case Number: 4419
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4670 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 07/09/2012 in Appeal No. 2381/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & 3 ORS.Through Chairman, Head Office Jyoti Nagar, Janpath Bhagwan D...
Case Number: 4670
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASHOK KRIPLANI & MR. GOVIND GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 882 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 04/12/2012 in Appeal No. 1195/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan) WITH IA/1593/2013,IA/1594/20131. RAJESH KUMARS/O SHRI HARI RAM PRASAD, R/O VILLAGE RAMNAGAR, P...
Case Number: 882
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BADRIDAS SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3582 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 23/06/2009 in Appeal No. 891/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDThrough Its Secretary Jyoti Nagar. JaipurRajasthan ...........Petition...
Case Number: 3582
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANUJ BHANDARI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3001 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 13/05/2013 in Appeal No. 85/2013 of the State Commission Rajasthan) WITH IA/5165/2013,IA/5166/20131. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & 2 ORS.THROUGH CHAIRMAN, JYOTI MARG,J...
Case Number: 3001
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. M.K. CHOUDHARY
Respondant Advocate MR. HARIOM YADUVANSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 343 OF 2013 IN RP/1095/20111. RAJASTHAN KHADI & GRAMODYOG BOARD & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. GEETA MANTRI & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDIN...
Case Number: 343
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P. C. DOGRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4068 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 28/06/2010 in Appeal No. 26/2011 & 1745/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAVINDER KUMAR JAINS/o Sh.Moti Lal Jain, R/o Qr. No-B-10 Vardhman Mahavir Open Uni...
Case Number: 4068
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 14-11-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PUSHPINDER SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 230 OF 2013 IN RP/2661/20121. NIRMALA BHARGAVA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & 2 ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING ME...
Case Number: 230
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN & MR. NIKHIL JAIN
Respondant Advocate MR. SANJEEV KUMAR VARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4051 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 07/08/2012 in Appeal No. 133/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT & INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. (RIICO) & ANR.Through it...
Case Number: 4051
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Rajasthan in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Rajasthan ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Rajasthan under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.