Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 768 OF 2013 IN RP/3952/20121. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD...........Appellants(s)Versus1. VINAY KUMAR GOYAL...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESIDING MEMBER...
Case Number: 768
|
Date of Filing: 06-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-04-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. J.P.N. GUPTA
Respondant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3206 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 12/06/2002 in Appeal No. 2263/1995 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJENDRA KUMAR SANWARIAC/o Sanwaria Dry Cleners Near Seth Sunderlal Ji Chhawani KotaRajastha...
Case Number: 3206
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2008
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shashank Sharma
Respondant Advocate Ashok Sharma,Pooja Choudhary
Case Number: 1237
|
Date of Filing: 21-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 07-05-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 115 OF 2014 IN RP/2715/20131. RAJASTHAN STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. NATVAR LAL & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESI...
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRASHANT BHAGWATI
Respondant Advocate MR. JAMSHED BEY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3407 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 02/01/2006 in Appeal No. 553/1999 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORETE CHITTOREGARH RAJASTHAN ....
Case Number: 3407
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1098 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 18/02/2013 in Appeal No. 701/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan) WITH IA/965/2014,IA/966/2014,IA/967/20141. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & 2 ORS.THROUGH CHAIRMAN, J...
Case Number: 1098
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-02-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2715 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 03/06/2013 in Appeal No. 498/2013 of the State Commission Rajasthan) WITH IA/4611/20131. RAJASTHAN STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LTD.THROUGH PLANT MANAGER, RAJASTHAN STA...
Case Number: 2715
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 638 OF 2013 IN RP/2539/20121. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. V.V. HARIT...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHOKE, PRESIDING MEMBER...
Case Number: 638
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3768 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 04/06/2008 in Appeal No. 1984/2007 of the State Commission Rajasthan) WITH IA/6346/20131. RAJASTHAN HOUSINGH BOARD & ANRRajasthan Housing Board Near Bus Stand Alwa...
Case Number: 3768
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2008
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR
Respondant Advocate MR.PAWAN KUMAR RAY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3789 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 01/09/2011 in Appeal No. 2261/2004 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ORS.Jyoti Nagar, Bhagwan Das Marf. Jaipur,Through its ChairmanJaip...
Case Number: 3789
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 22-01-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Rajasthan in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Rajasthan ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Rajasthan under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.