Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SURYA KANT
Respondant Advocate MR. DUSHYANT PARASHAR (12/05/2014)
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1728 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 08/01/2014 in Appeal No. 102/2013 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDDIVISION FIRST, SECTOR-11, CHOPASANI HOUSING BOARD, JODHPURRAJASTHAN.....
Case Number: 1729
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SURYA KANT
Respondant Advocate MR. DUSHYANT PARASHAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1728 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 08/01/2014 in Appeal No. 102/2013 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDDIVISION FIRST, SECTOR-11, CHOPASANI HOUSING BOARD, JODHPURRAJASTHAN.....
Case Number: 1730
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SURYA KANT
Respondant Advocate MR. DUSHYANT PARASHAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1728 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 08/01/2014 in Appeal No. 102/2013 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDDIVISION FIRST, SECTOR-11, CHOPASANI HOUSING BOARD, JODHPURRAJASTHAN.....
Case Number: 1731
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR
Respondant Advocate MR. ASHWIN KUMAR BOHRA, MR. JITENDRA MITRUKA MR. YATINDRA PRAKASH SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3658 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/09/2013 in Appeal No. 32/2013 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR.JYOTI NAGAR, JANPATH , BHAGWAN DAS ROAD, JAIPUR THORUGH SECRETAR...
Case Number: 3658
|
Date of Filing: 14-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR
Respondant Advocate MR. ASHWIN KUMAR BOHRA, MR. JITENDRA MITRUKA MR. YATINDRA PRAKASH SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3659 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/09/2013 in Appeal No. 33/2013 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR.RAJASTHAN HOUSE BOARD,JYOTI NAGAR, JANPATH,BHAGWAN DAS ROAD, JAI...
Case Number: 3659
|
Date of Filing: 14-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1879 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 06/02/2013 in Appeal No. 453/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. CHIEF MANAGER, AJMER DEPOT, RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & 3 ORS.RAJASTHAN STAT...
Case Number: 1879
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2014
Court Name: Chittaurgarh
Appelant Advocate Rajnish Pitliya
Respondant Advocate A. Vyas
Case Number: 146
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2939 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 24/01/2013 in Appeal No. 1925/2006 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN STATE PENSION AND PENSIONERS WELFARE & ANR.-JAIPURRAJASTHAN2. GOVERMENT OF RAJASTH...
Case Number: 2939
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-06-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2843 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 11/04/2012 in Appeal No. 96/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MANAGER, RAJASTHAN STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANR.BeawarAjmerRajasthan2. Managing Directo...
Case Number: 2843
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. S.N. BOHRA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4579 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 21/08/2012 in Appeal No. 1320/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDThrough Secretary, Head Office,Jyoti Nagar,JAIPURRAJASTHAN..............
Case Number: 4579
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Rajasthan in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Rajasthan ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Rajasthan under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.