Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. ASHWANI BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2650 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/11/2011 in Appeal No. 106/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. POST MASTER GENERAL, RAJASTHAN & ANR.Southern Region,Ajmer2. Superitendent, P.O. Chittorgarh ...
Case Number: 2650
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANAND SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2066 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 12/12/2007 in Appeal No. 66/2005 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. DR. BABU LALS/O SH. MOHAN LAL SHARMA, R/O GUNDOJ HALL, NEAR BADI BRAHMPURI, PARMAR KUNJ, SIROH...
Case Number: 2066
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4422 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1483/2006 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MADAN LAL SUNGER & ANRS/o Shri Siriram Sunger, R/o B- 185, Kailash Kunh,Vaishali NagarJAIPUR...
Case Number: 4422
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4422 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1483/2006 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MADAN LAL SUNGER & ANRS/o Shri Siriram Sunger, R/o B- 185, Kailash Kunh,Vaishali NagarJAIPUR...
Case Number: 4814
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA MADAN
Respondant Advocate MR. UMESH NAGPAL, MR. PANKAJ SHARMA & MR. LOKESH BHARGAV
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 112 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/09/2011 in Appeal No. 1685/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LIMITEDVidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar,JaipurRajasthan.........
Case Number: 112
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.N. BOHRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2996 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 03/06/2014 in Appeal No. 683/2013 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED & ANR.THROUGH MANAGER, OPP SHIV MANDIR,SECTOR-7 7/9...
Case Number: 2996
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. SURYA PRAKASH GANDHI & MR. AMIT GANDHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2707 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 10/02/2014 in Appeal No. 712/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDTHROUGH RESIDENT ENGINEER, RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD, AJMERRAJASTHAN.......
Case Number: 2707
|
Date of Filing: 07-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 03-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2469 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 05/05/2014 in Appeal No. 280/2014 of the State Commission Rajasthan) WITH IA/3903/20141. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR.THROUGH COMMMISIONER HOUSING BOARD, JANPATH ...
Case Number: 2469
|
Date of Filing: 05-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK JAIN
Respondant Advocate MR. DHARMENDRA KUMAR JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 693 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 15/04/2013 in Appeal No. 109/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDTHROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD, VAISHALI NAGARAJMER...
Case Number: 693
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-08-2014
Court Name: Jaipur-I
Appelant Advocate VIKARAM SINGH RATHOUR
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1314
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Rajasthan in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Rajasthan ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Rajasthan under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.