Court Name: Kota
Appelant Advocate Govind naamdev
Respondant Advocate Shree Ram Mehta
Case Number: 56
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 13-08-2015
Court Name: Kota
Appelant Advocate Virendra Rathore
Respondant Advocate Sandeep Jain
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 12-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-08-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Mootha
Respondant Advocate M.L. Vyas
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1COMPLAINT CASE NO: 59/2010Santosh Kumar Hakeem s/o J.M.Hakeem r/o 20/142 Kaveri Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur.Vs. Rajasthan Housing Board, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur through Chairman & ors.Date of Order 3.8.2015...
Case Number: 59
|
Date of Filing: 20-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 21-08-2015
Court Name: Ganganagar
Appelant Advocate RAJENDER KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-08-2015
Court Name: Jhunjhunun
Appelant Advocate SARWAN KUMAR SAINI
Respondant Advocate Indarjit Sarma
Case Number: 636
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2015
Court Name: Kota
Appelant Advocate Dinesh kumar sharma
Respondant Advocate Jai prakash sharma
जिला उपभोक्ता विवाद प्रतितोष मंच, कोटा (राजस्थान)। परिवाद संख्या:-120/2011 रामचन्द्र राठौर पुत्र गोपाल लाल जाति ...
Case Number: 120
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2015
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 192/20131. NITIN SHARMA B-3, FLATE NO-6, NEAR HOLI CHILD SCHOOL GHAZIABAD...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAJASTHAN ELEC.91 AMBEDKAR ROAD GHAZIABAD............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI HARPAL SINGH PRESIDENTHON'BLE MS. MS. VA...
Case Number: 192
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-07-2015
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate MANISH VYAS
Respondant Advocate IRFAAN GOURI
Case Number: 768
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 31-07-2015
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate RITESH GEHLOT
Respondant Advocate NATWAR SHARMA
Case Number: 843
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 31-07-2015
Court Name: Rajsamand
Appelant Advocate Ratan Singh Rawat
Respondant Advocate Dhanendra Mehta, Bhupendra Sanadhya
Case Number: 46
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Rajasthan in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Rajasthan ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Rajasthan under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.