company-name-logo

Railway

Latest Judgments

Total 3748 Consumer Court Cases Against Railway.

Madhya Pradesh

West Central Railway V/S Deepesh Samaiya

Railway  

Court Name: Sagar

Appelant Advocate Anil Samaiya

Respondant Advocate K.P Dube

...

Case Number: 70

|

Date of Filing: 07-08-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Manesh Mobile Shopy, Solapur. V/S Nilesh Shiddramappa Birajdar, 142, Railway Line, Solapur.

Mobile   Railway  

Court Name: Solapur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Solapur.Nr. Central Admin. Bldg., Collector Office Compound, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/07/39( Date of Filing : 05 Feb 2007 )1. Nilesh Shiddramappa Birajdar, 142, Railway Line, Solapur.............Complainant(s)Versus1. Manesh M...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 05-02-2007

|

Date of Upload: 01-11-2022

Karnataka

South-Western Railway V/S K.Krishna Boyee

Railway  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Sri.H.V.Sreenath

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009consumer case(CC) No. CC/07/103 K.Krishna Boyee ...........Appellant(s)Vs.South-Western RailwayThe Chief Security Commission,The Chief Person...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 26-04-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

South Westen railway V/S Sridhara Murthy

Railway  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009consumer case(CC) No. CC/07/58 Sridhara Murthy ...........Appellant(s)Vs.South Westen railway ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Complainant(s...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 13-03-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Jivendip Currer, 98, Goldfinch Peth, Solapur. V/S Umesh Pandit Salunke, 68 Railway line, Station Road, Solapur.

Railway  

Court Name: Solapur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Solapur.Nr. Central Admin. Bldg., Collector Office Compound, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/07/49( Date of Filing : 15 Feb 2007 )1. Umesh Pandit Salunke, 68 Railway line, Station Road, Solapur...............Complainant(s)Versus1. Ji...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 15-02-2007

|

Date of Upload: 04-11-2022

Maharashtra

Ministry of Railway V/S Dhananjay Manohar Chitriv

Railway  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 06-02-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

The Station master Central Railway V/S Baburao s/o Venkatrao Jadhav

Railway  

Court Name: Bidar

Appelant Advocate PM.Dheshpande

Respondant Advocate Vilasrao More

Case Number: 80

|

Date of Filing: 04-09-2006

|

Date of Upload: 25-03-2021

Telangana

B. Venu S/o Bhairaiah, aged 32 years, Occ: Electronics Business V/S Mani Kumar S/o Appa Rao, aged 43 years, Occu: Railway Employee

Railway  

Court Name: Nizamabad

Appelant Advocate Raj Kumar Subedar

Respondant Advocate Y.S. Yellanand Gupta

Case Number: 83

|

Date of Filing: 08-12-2005

|

Date of Upload: 27-02-2016

Maharashtra

The General Manager S,E. Railway Calcutta V/S Shrichand N. Dodani

Railway  

Court Name: Gondia

Appelant Advocate Ad Mohanti

Respondant Advocate Ad Wadekar

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GONDIAROOM NO. 214, SECOND FLOOR, COLLECTORATE BUILDING,AMGAON ROAD, GONDIAComplaint Case No. CC/06/771. Shrichand N. DodaniGorelal chouck GondiaGondiaMaharastra2. Devanand R. AhujaGondiaGondiyaMaharastra3. Mahedra Dodani GondiaGondiyaM...

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 21-12-2006

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

THE WESTERN RAILWAY AND OTHER V/S R.V.SAMPAT

Railway  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate RAJIV N.MEHTA

Respondant Advocate S.S.SHEVADE

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 28-11-2005

|

Date of Upload: 02-08-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Railway in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Railway ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.