Railway
Latest Judgments
Total 3716 Consumer Court Cases Against Railway.
South-Western Railway V/S K.Krishna Boyee
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Sri.H.V.Sreenath
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009consumer case(CC) No. CC/07/103 K.Krishna Boyee ...........Appellant(s)Vs.South-Western RailwayThe Chief Security Commission,The Chief Person...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
South Westen railway V/S Sridhara Murthy
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009consumer case(CC) No. CC/07/58 Sridhara Murthy ...........Appellant(s)Vs.South Westen railway ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Complainant(s...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Jivendip Currer, 98, Goldfinch Peth, Solapur. V/S Umesh Pandit Salunke, 68 Railway line, Station Road, Solapur.
Court Name: Solapur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Solapur.Nr. Central Admin. Bldg., Collector Office Compound, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/07/49( Date of Filing : 15 Feb 2007 )1. Umesh Pandit Salunke, 68 Railway line, Station Road, Solapur...............Complainant(s)Versus1. Ji...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2007
|
Date of Upload: 04-11-2022
Ministry of Railway V/S Dhananjay Manohar Chitriv
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Station master Central Railway V/S Baburao s/o Venkatrao Jadhav
Court Name: Bidar
Appelant Advocate PM.Dheshpande
Respondant Advocate Vilasrao More
Case Number: 80
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2006
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2021
B. Venu S/o Bhairaiah, aged 32 years, Occ: Electronics Business V/S Mani Kumar S/o Appa Rao, aged 43 years, Occu: Railway Employee
Court Name: Nizamabad
Appelant Advocate Raj Kumar Subedar
Respondant Advocate Y.S. Yellanand Gupta
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2005
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2016
The General Manager S,E. Railway Calcutta V/S Shrichand N. Dodani
Court Name: Gondia
Appelant Advocate Ad Mohanti
Respondant Advocate Ad Wadekar
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GONDIAROOM NO. 214, SECOND FLOOR, COLLECTORATE BUILDING,AMGAON ROAD, GONDIAComplaint Case No. CC/06/771. Shrichand N. DodaniGorelal chouck GondiaGondiaMaharastra2. Devanand R. AhujaGondiaGondiyaMaharastra3. Mahedra Dodani GondiaGondiyaM...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
THE WESTERN RAILWAY AND OTHER V/S R.V.SAMPAT
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAJIV N.MEHTA
Respondant Advocate S.S.SHEVADE
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2005
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2019
Northern Railway Head Quarters V/S Smt. Kempamma
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.Execution Application(EA) No. EA/63/2006 Smt. Kempamma ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Northern Railway Head Quarter...
Case Number: 63
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
S C Gupta V/S Union Of India Railway
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M H Khan
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. M/2005/83(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Union Of India Railwaya BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE Virendra Singh PRESIDENTHON'ABLE...
Case Number: 2005
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Railway in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Railway ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.