Railway
Latest Judgments
Total 3716 Consumer Court Cases Against Railway.
Avdhesh Singh V/S Northern Railway
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P P Srivastav m.h. khan
Respondant Advocate arun kumar pandey
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2008/814(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Northern Railwaya...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Avdhesh Singha.......
Case Number: 2008
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Ashok Kumar Singh V/S Railway Station
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Prem Prakash Srivastav
Respondant Advocate -
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2009/54(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Railway Stationa...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Ashok Kumar Singha.....
Case Number: 2009
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The General Manager, Eastern Railway V/S Upendra Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate None
Respondant Advocate None
Case Number: 146
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2007
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2023
GENERAL MANAGER,NORTH CENTRAL RAILWAY V/S K.ABDULKADER
Court Name: Malappuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMB2 BLOCK, CIVIL STATION, PIN-676 505consumer case(CC) No. OP/05/84 K.ABDULKADER ...........Appellant(s)Vs.GENERAL MANAGER,NORTH CENTRAL RAILWAY ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. AYISHAKUTTY. E 2. C.S. SULEKHA BEEVI 3. MOHAMMED MUSTAFA KO...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Manager, Indian Railway V/S Karan Singh Mewada
Court Name: Sehore
Appelant Advocate Mr. GD Bairagi
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Vineet Srivastva V/S Northern Railway
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P P Srivastva
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2005/14(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Northern Railway A BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Ashok Kumar Chaudhary PRESIDING MEMBERHON'ABL...
Case Number: 2005
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Randhir Singh Suman V/S N Railway
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P P Srivastva
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2005/1787(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. N Railway A BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Jugul Kishor PRESIDING MEMBER For the Appellant:Fo...
Case Number: 2005
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, and Others, V/S M/s Shyam Sundar Stores through Prop. Shyam Sundar,
Court Name: Patna
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 12-03-2022
SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY V/S MR. M.L.AGARWAL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR. G.VENKATA SWAMY GOUD
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/1512/06(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. MR. M.L.AGARWAL2-1-113 TOBACCO BAZAR SECUNDERABADAndhra Pradesh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAYCHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER RAIL NILAYAM SECUNDERABADAndhra Pradesh2...
Case Number: 1512
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
South Western Railway V/S Prof. K. Shreesha Acharya
Court Name: Udupi
Appelant Advocate Sri A Santhosh Hebbar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2020
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Railway in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Railway ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.