company-name-logo

Railway

Latest Judgments

Total 3748 Consumer Court Cases Against Railway.

Madhya Pradesh

railway V/S sheela parekh

Railway  

Court Name: Ujjain

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 2009

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 19-02-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Superintendent , Railway Station V/S Smt. Rama

Railway  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate R.K Goyal Ad.

Respondant Advocate Gyan Prakash Singh Ad.

Case Number: 189

|

Date of Filing: 04-09-2008

|

Date of Upload: 23-07-2022

Madhya Pradesh

railway V/S Ku chitra sharma

Railway  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate PANDEY

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 23-07-2007

|

Date of Upload: 10-02-2016

Maharashtra

ABHILASHA RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CO-OP HSG LTD V/S THE MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

Railway  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Smt. V. K. Khatu/Shri. D.I.Sndge/Shri. N.S.Shaikh/Shri. K. N.Gaikwad/Smt.A.N. Pathan

Respondant Advocate Mr. Uday B. Warunjikar

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/178(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/09/2009 in Case No. 31/2005 of District DCF, South Mumbai)1. THE MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAITHROUGH THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, MA...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 15-02-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

THE MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI V/S ABHILASHA RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CHS LTD

Railway  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate UDAY P. WARUNJIKAR

Respondant Advocate Ms. A. N. Pathan

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/484(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/09/2009 in Case No. 31/2005 of District DCF, South Mumbai)1. ABHILASHA RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CHS LTD26/04, MATHURADAS ROAD (EXTN), KANDIVALI (W),...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 03-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY & ORS. V/S MANEKLAL AGARWAL

Railway  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3978 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 08/06/2010 in Appeal No. 1765/2007 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. MANEKLAL AGARWALO/at Rama Towers, 5-4-82, 2nd Floor, TSK Chambers, M.G. RoadSecunderaba...

Case Number: 3978

|

Date of Filing: 25-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 17-01-2011

Madhya Pradesh

western railway V/S ramchndra

Railway  

Court Name: Ujjain

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 2010

|

Date of Filing: 04-02-2010

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2016

Madhya Pradesh

West Central Railway Jabalpur V/S Naresh Pawar

Railway  

Court Name: Hoshangabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 154

|

Date of Filing: 26-07-2010

|

Date of Upload: 16-02-2016

NCDRC

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, INDIAN RAILWAY WELFARE ORGANIZATIONA AND ANR. V/S D.S.YADAV

Railway   Indian Railway  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 84 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 10/09/2006 in Appeal No. 561/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. D.S.YADAVFLOT , NO. 34-2B. ARAVALI VIEW , RAIL BVIHAR , PHASE , II SECTORE 56. JE, GORGAON HARY...

Case Number: 84

|

Date of Filing: 08-01-2007

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2011

Kerala

The Station Master, Mangalore Central Railway Station V/S Savitha Bhat

Mangalore   Railway  

Court Name: Kasaragod

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/10/1941. Savitha BhatRetired Teaher, CC.No.36, Chunmaya Colony, VidyanagarKasaragodKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Station Master, Mangalore Central Railway StationPo.MangaloreMangaloreKarnataka2. Divisional Commercial Manager Southern Railway, P...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 13-09-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Railway in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Railway ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.