Railway
Latest Judgments
Total 3716 Consumer Court Cases Against Railway.
The Additional Divisional Railway Manager South Western Railway V/S V.Thilakavathi W/o of D.Venugopal
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Sri.D.Venugopal
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Sahakara Bhavan, Cunnigham Road, Bangalore 560052Complaint Case No. CC/10/1461 1. V.Thilakavathi W/o of D.VenugopalNo.52, 2nd Floor, 6th Cross, Gandhinagar Bangalore-560009.Banga...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 26-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
General Manager, Sourth Railway V/S Mythili W/o N.Sampath
Court Name: Vellore
Appelant Advocate M. Kuppaiah
Respondant Advocate C.G.Sridhar
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSathuvachari , vellore-632009.Complaint Case No. CC/06/19 1. Mythili W/o N.Sampath 43 Periyadhanasubraiamudhali St. Velapadi, Vellore-1 ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. General Manager, Sourth Railway Head Quarter Office Park Town Chenna...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 05-12-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MAHAPRABHANDHAK CENTRAL RAILWAY V/S SMT NINNI VIJAIVARGIYA
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate NAVEEN SONI ADV
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S INDIAN RAILWAY WELFARE ORGANISATION
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Railway Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate A.K.TEWARI
Respondant Advocate NA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 79 OF 20041. INDIAN RAILWAY WELFARE ORGANISATION...........Complainant(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER Fo...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2004
|
Date of Upload: 27-09-2010
T.A.SHAHUL HAMEED V/S GENERAL MANAGER,SOUTH WEST RAILWAY
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.RENGANATHAN
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. A/10/491(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/03/2010 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/10/8 of District Alappuzha) 1. GENERAL MANAGER,SOUTH WEST RAILWAYSOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY,HUBLI,BANGALOREBANGALOREKARNATAKA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. T.A.SHAHUL HAMEEDTHATTUPARAMBI...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Divisional Railway Manager, V/S KV Santhosh Kumar,
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
In The Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumKannurComplaint Case No. CC/10/151 1. KV Santhosh Kumar, Advocate, Nalinam, Dharmadam amsom desom, ThalasseryKannur Kerala ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. The Divisional Railway Manager, Southern Railway, Palakkad Division, Palakkad,Kerala...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Union of India through the Secretary/Chairman Railway Northern Railway and Others, V/S Arun Kumar,
Court Name: Patna
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 85
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 04-01-2022
CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER(REFUND), NORTHERN RAILWAY V/S SHIV PRAKASH BAJPAI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate S.P.BAJPAI
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1181 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 20/02/2006 in Appeal No. 1860/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. SHIV PRAKASH BAJPAIHOUSE NO.120 DUPRAPUR IN FRONT OF BHURI DEVI MANDIR DISTT UNNA UP ......
Case Number: 1181
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2006
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2010
GAURANG K. MEHTA V/S DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. REKHA AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2915 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 18/02/2010 in Appeal No. 871/2007 of the State Commission Gujarat) 1. DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGERWestern Railway, Pratap NagarVadodaraGujarat ...........Petitioner(s)...
Case Number: 2915
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2010
AYUBULLAH KHAN AND ORS. V/S MAHAPRABANDHAK UTTAR RAILWAY AND ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESHWAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. SIKANEER ALI & MR. AYUBULLAH KHAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3542 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 09/04/2006 in Appeal No. 914/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. MAHAPRABANDHAK UTTAR RAILWAY AND ORS.MEHAPRAB ANDHAK UTTAR RAILWAY LUCKNOW U,P .............
Case Number: 3542
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2010
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Railway in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Railway ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.