Railway
Latest Judgments
Total 3748 Consumer Court Cases Against Railway.
INCHARGE CENTRAL RAILWAY BOOKING OFFICE & ORS V/S HEMANT VASANT BHAVSAR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V D BHAVSAR
Respondant Advocate Mr A N Samant
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/144(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/01/2010 in Case No. 189/2009 of District Nashik)1. HEMANT VASANT BHAVSARR/O 5 PRADHAN PARK M G ROAD NASHIK NASHIK Maharastra2. Hemarani Heman...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 05-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SHRI HEMNT BHAVSAR & ORS V/S UNION OF INDIA, CENTRAL RAILWAY & ORS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A. N. SAMANT
Respondant Advocate Adv.Mr.Bhavsar
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/144(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/01/2010 in Case No. 189/2009 of District Nashik)1. HEMANT VASANT BHAVSARR/O 5 PRADHAN PARK M G ROAD NASHIK NASHIK Maharastra2. Hemarani Heman...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Eastern Railway Chief Medical Superintendent V/S SUNIL KR. BRAMHA
Court Name: Burdwan
Appelant Advocate Mrinmay Sinha
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 08-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
GENERAL MANAGER, EASTERN RAILWAY GORAKHPUR AND ORS. V/S RAM BALAK PANDEY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate ASHUTOSH SHARMA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1108 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 18/09/2006 in Appeal No. 603/1999 of the State Commission Bihar)1. RAM BALAK PANDEYS/O. RAM SHARAN PANDEY R/O.VILLGE , BHAUR RAJ GRAM DISTT, MADHUBANI BIHAR ........
Case Number: 1108
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2011
CENTRAL RAILWAY V/S PREMLATA LOKHANDE
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate PRAVEEN JAIN ADV
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 15-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 25-02-2016
Y . GOPAL KRISHAN V/S SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY & ORS
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESHWAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2253 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/07/2007 in Appeal No. 7/2001 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY & ORS Tata Nagar Railway StationBihar2. THE STATION MASTERSuratgarh Railw...
Case Number: 2253
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2011
The General Manager,N.F Railway V/S Nurul Islam
Court Name: Cooch Behar
Appelant Advocate Kinsuk Barman
Respondant Advocate S.P.Sehanabis
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2018
Indian Railway Catering And Tourism Corporation Ltd V/S M.V.Chandran
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/09/1261. M.V.ChandranMuttathil House,Velayanadu,VellangalloreThrissurKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Indian Railway Catering And Tourism Corporation Ltd9th Floor,Bank Of Baroda Building,No.16,Parliament Street,New DelhiNew Delhi2. Bombay Central Rail...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The General Manager, S.C. Railway V/S A Bharathi, W/o.Anjaiah
Court Name: Warangal
Appelant Advocate V Venkateshwaw Rao
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC 31/20101. A Bharathi, W/o.AnjaiahH.NO.3-7-33, Gudibandal, Kumarpally, HNK BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. D.CHIRANJEEVI BABU PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. P.Praveenkumar MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERBEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM :: WARANGAL Present : Sri D. Chiranjeevi Babu, Pre...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Employers Prividend Fund Orgarization sub Reginal office 165 A Railway Lines Survase Towers Solapur V/S Ramchandra Bhaganna Jindam
Court Name: Solapur
Appelant Advocate Marathe
Respondant Advocate
1Behind District Treasury Office, Near Central Administrative, Building, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/10/103 1. Ramchandra Bhaganna JindamBl.No.95 Mahesh nagar vidi Gharkul Nagar A Group Hydarbad Rd,SolapurSolapurmaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Employers Prividend F...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Railway in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Railway ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.