Railway
Latest Judgments
Total 3718 Consumer Court Cases Against Railway.
Nothern Railway V/S Alok Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh.Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv. for the appellants
Respondant Advocate Ms. Veena B.Sethi, Adv. for respondents no. 1 to 7, None for respondent no. 8.
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 453 of 2010 1. Alok Kumar ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Nothern Railway ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant :Sh.Sandeep ...
Case Number: 453
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Alok Kumar V/S Northern Railway Moradabad Division
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. Veena B. Sethi, Adv. for the appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv. for respondents no. 1 & 2, None for proforma respondent no. 3 to 8
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 472 of 2010 1. Northern Railway Moradabad DivisionMoradabad through Senior Divisional Commercial Manager ...........Appellant(s)V...
Case Number: 472
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Station Master, Railway Station V/S K.Abdul Rahiman
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate George John Plamootil, Kasaragod
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/2601. K.Abdul RahimanS/o.Mohammed, R/at Haddad Reisence, Haddad Nagar, Pallikare.Po.KasaragodKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Station Master, Railway StationKasaragodKasaragodKerala2. The ManagerDivisional Operations, Southern Railway, Palakkad...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 04-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2016
D.R.M. CENTRAL RAILWAY V/S SHRI. MUKUND S/O. PARSHURAM KANE,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV. TATKE
Respondant Advocate ADV. LAMBAT
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/04/2393(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/11/2004 in Case No. CC/03/352 of District )1. SHRI. MUKUND S/O. PARSHURAM KA...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
DRM CENTRAL RAILWAY V/S MUKUND P KANE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV.TATKE
Respondant Advocate ADV.LAMBAT
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001Miscellaneous Application No. ma/679/091. MUKUND P KANE NAGPUR BEFORE: HON'BLE P.N.KASHALKAR PRESIDING MEMBER HON'BLE N. ARUMUGAM ME...
Case Number: 679
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MANAGER, PASCHIM MADHYA RAILWAY V/S VINAY JAIN
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 28-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 12-05-2017
PREM SAXENA V/S DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (COMMERCIAL) WESTERN CENTRAL RAILWAY & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESHWAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1304 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 01/12/2010 in Appeal No. 2375/2010 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (COMMERCIAL) WESTERN CENTRAL RAILWAY & ANR.Western Central R...
Case Number: 1304
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2011
DISHANT SACHDEVA V/S GENERAL MANAGER WESTERN CENTRAL RAILWAY & ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESHWAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1305 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 25/10/2010 in Appeal No. 2160/2010 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. GENERAL MANAGER WESTERN CENTRAL RAILWAY & ORS.JabalpurMadhya Pradesh2. DIVISIONAL RAILW...
Case Number: 1305
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2011
WESTERN CENTRE RAILWAY V/S AJAY KUMAR PANDEY
Court Name: Jabalpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 29-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Railway in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Railway ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.