Railway
Latest Judgments
Total 3718 Consumer Court Cases Against Railway.
Senior railway Divisional manager V/S T K sadhandan
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Jaison Chemmannur
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/961. T K sadhandanThaikattil (H)Perakam PO,VazhapillyThrissurKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Senior railway Divisional managerTrivandrum Central Railway StationTrivandrumKerala2. Station ManagerThrissur railway StationThrissurKerala............Opp...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Mandya Railway Station V/S Sri.N.Channabasappa
Court Name: Mandya
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate Sri.A.Immanuel
MANDYA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMD.C. Office Compound, Opp. District Court Premises,Mandya - 571401.Complaint Case No. CC/11/71. Sri.N.ChannabasappaC/o Rudraswamy, R/at Door No.1319, 1st Cross, Nehrunagar, Mandya.MandyaKarnataka...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Ma...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Divisional Railway Manager Bhavnagar V/S Kaushalayaba Deepaksinh Bhagwanji wala
Court Name: Bhavnagar
Appelant Advocate Sanatkumar K. Solanki
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2020
Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railway V/S Pramod.K.
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/841. Pramod.K.S/o.Kunhiramn, Rama Nilayam, Manikoth, Uppilikkai.Po. PudukkaiKasaragodKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern RailwayDRMS Office, PalakkadPalakkadKerala............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONORABLE...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 04-03-2016
AIRTEL RETAIL OUTLET SAI COMMUNICATION SHRI Y.B.CHAUBE ADHIVAKTA KE PAS PREMNAGAR BALAGHAT TEH. AND V/S JAKIYA RUHI S/O SHRI ABDUL MUID, NIWASI- WARD NO. 30 SAREKHA CHOWKI K PAS, RAILWAY LINE KE PAS BALAGHAT M.P.
Court Name: Balaghat
Appelant Advocate ADV. DHANANJAY ANDHARE
Respondant Advocate SHRI Y.B.CHAUBE
Case Number: 87
|
Date of Filing: 25-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2022
The Divisional Railway Manager and Another V/S M. Abdul Wahab
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/2951. M. Abdul WahabTC 6/1039 (4),Padayani road,Vattiyoorkavu P.OTVMKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Divisional Railway Manager and AnotherTVM Railway Division,ThycaudTVMKerala2. The Additional General Manager and Director - Public GrievancesSo...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SOUTHERN RAILWAY V/S DR.M.H.RAHIMKUTTY
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.ASHOK KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/10/504(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/05/2010 in Case No. CC444/02 of District Thiruvananthapuram)1. DR.M.H.RAHIMKUTTYREESNI,NEW KUVALLOR,PULIMOODU LANE,VATTIYOORKAVUTRIVANDRUMKERAL...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 02-03-2016
M/S RAILWAY HOSPITAL, CHIEF MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT V/S MOHAMMAD ISMAIL KHADARI S/O M.A.HUSSAIN
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S GOPI RAJESH AND ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR.R.DILIP KUMAR
First Appeal No. FA/939/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Kurnool)1. MOHAMMAD ISMAIL KHADARI S/O M.A.HUSSAIND.NO.70-7-66/C4, T.S.R.NAGAR, KAKINADA. BEFORE:HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERBEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRES...
Case Number: 939
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Railway in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Railway ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.