Railway
Latest Judgments
Total 3749 Consumer Court Cases Against Railway.
Case Number: 135
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2016
Case Number: 265
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2007
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2017
The Muncipal corporation of greater Mumbai V/S Abhilasha railway Employes
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate Uday Prakash Warunjikar
Respondant Advocate V.K. Khatu
Execution Application No. EA/13/20101. Abhilasha railway EmployesMumbai...........Appellant(s)Versus1. The Muncipal corporation of greater MumbaiMumbai...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE MEMBER PRESENT:दरखास...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Station Master/ Manager, Burdwan Railway Station V/S SMT. GITA HAZRA
Court Name: Burdwan
Appelant Advocate Santi Ranjan Hazra
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The manager, Nest ratail India Ltd. ,K.P. Road , Punalur V/S Abhilash. M.S, Kollanazhikathu veedu, Near Railway Station, Edamon, Punalur, Kollam
Court Name: Kollam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 181 Of 20121. Abhilash. M.S, Kollanazhikathu veedu, Near Railway Station, Edamon, Punalur, Kollam...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The manager, Nest ratail India Ltd. ,K.P. Road , Punalur............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONORABLE MRS. VASANTHAKUMARI G PRESIDENTHONORABLE MR....
Case Number: 181
|
Date of Filing: 29-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
CONSUMER WELFARE ASSOCIATION V/S CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER, WESTERN RAILWAY HEADQUATERS OFFICE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S R BHOSALE
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/12/1741. CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER, WESTERN RAILWAY HEADQUATERS OFFICECHURCHAGATE MUMBAIMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. CONSUMER WELFARE ASSOCIATI...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
STATION MANAGER, MANMAD RAILWAY STATION & ANR. V/S BIMLADEVI RADHESHYAM NATANI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAHUL JOSHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4449 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 04/03/2010 in Appeal No. 1316/2009 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. BIMLADEVI RADHESHYAM NATANIR/o. Malegaon Camp, MalegaonNasikMaharashtra...........Petitione...
Case Number: 4449
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2012
BHUVNESH CLINIC V/S COMMERCIAL INSPECTOR, NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESHWAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 355 OF 2012 IN RP/2552/20111. COMMERCIAL INSPECTOR, NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. BHUVNESH CLINIC...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B...
Case Number: 355
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2012
The Divisional Manager, Sourthern Railway V/S V.K.Abdulla
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate A.Rajagopala, Kasaragod
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/2221. V.K.AbdullaS/o.Imbichi Moideen, R/at M.P.P.IV-2, Hill Block, CPCRI, Quarters, Kudlu village and Po. Kasaragod 671124KasaragodKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Divisional Manager, Sourthern RailwayDivisional Railway Manager's Office, Palgha...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Sou. Anagha Prasanna Walimbe V/S Divisional Railway Manager, Central Railway
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Salim M. Sayed
Respondant Advocate Pankaj J. Das
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/05/385(Arisen out of Order Dated 12/01/2005 in Case No. 246/2002 of District Solapur)1. Divisional Railway Manager, Central RailwaySolapur Division,SolapurMaharashtra..............
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Railway in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Railway ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.