Railway
Latest Judgments
Total 3749 Consumer Court Cases Against Railway.
HARIDASAN V/S THE DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY PALAKKAD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S RENGANATHAN
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/13/254(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/01/2013 in Case No. 146/2012 of District Kannur)1. THE DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY PALAKKADPALAKKAD...........Appellant(s)V...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 647
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2020
RAJINDER KUMAR V/S RAILWAY RECRUITMENT CELL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANKAR N. SINHA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3314 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 03/08/2009 in Appeal No. 407/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAILWAY RECRUITMENT CELLNorthern Railway, Baroad HouseNew Delhi - 110001...........Petitioner(s...
Case Number: 3314
|
Date of Filing: 03-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2013
SMT. SUMAN KALIYA V/S PASCHIM MADHYA RAILWAY AND ANOTHER
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2016
Case Number: 58
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2016
DIRECTOR GENERAL, RAILWAY HOSPITAL & ANR. V/S NARENDER KUMAR SENGAR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANOJ RANJAN SINHA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 260 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 21/02/2013 in Complaint No. 29/2013 of the State Commission Delhi)1. NARENDER KUMAR SENGARS/O. HRI KEHARI SINGH SENGAR,Y-12, VIKAS LOK COLONY, OPPOSITE DHANIPUR MANDI, G....
Case Number: 260
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2013
Union Of India Railway V/S Pooran Chandra Madheshia
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Alok Ranjan
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2013/345(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Pooran Chandra Madheshia a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Union Of ...
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Rose Pharmacuticals Pvt Ltd V/S Railway
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M H Khan
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2012/2242(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Railway a BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Alok Kumar Bose PRESIDING MEMBERHON'...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Omparkash S/o Ganpatrai Navatai V/S Union Of India Through General Manager,Central Railway
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/01/833(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/04/2001 in Case No. cc/2000/60 of District Wardha)1. Union Of India Through G...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2001
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
THE CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER (REFUNDS), SOUTHERN RAILWAY V/S GOPALAKRISHNAN T
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/12/1801. GOPALAKRISHNAN T49/1174E, SREELAKAM, GAYATHRI LANE, EDAPPALLY, 682 024 ERNAKULAMKERALA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER (REFUNDS), SOUTHERN RAILWAYTHYCAUD P.O., THIRUV...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Railway in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Railway ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.