company-name-logo

Railway

Latest Judgments

Total 3749 Consumer Court Cases Against Railway.

Rajasthan

General Manager, Union Of India Owning Pachim Madhya Railway V/S Vijay Singhal

Union Of India   Railway  

Court Name: Kota

Appelant Advocate Vijay Singhal

Respondant Advocate Naresh Sharma

जिला उपभोक्ता विवाद प्रतितोष मंच, कोटा (राजस्थान)।पीठासीन:श्रीएम अनवर आलम,अध्यक्ष ,श्रीमती हेमलताभार्गव �...

Case Number: 238

|

Date of Filing: 25-01-2010

|

Date of Upload: 11-05-2015

Maharashtra

Union Of India Central Railway Through its G.m. V/S Omprakash Ganpatrai Nevatia

Union Of India   Railway  

Court Name: Wardha

Appelant Advocate Adv. A.M.Purekar

Respondant Advocate Adv. A.G.Lambat

...

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 20-06-2001

|

Date of Upload: 11-05-2015

Uttar Pradesh

Railway V/S Ku Rajnee Shahi

Railway  

Court Name: Gorakhpur

Appelant Advocate Rajesh Kumar Srivastava

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 327

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2006

|

Date of Upload: 07-05-2015

West Bengal

Chief Commercial Manager, South Eastern Railway V/S Fazlur Rahaman

Railway  

Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II.8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/613/20141. Fazlur RahamanFlat No. 210, 2 Girish Ghosh Road, Belur Math, Howrah-711202............Complainant(s)Versus1. Chief Commercial Manager...

Case Number: 613

|

Date of Filing: 30-12-2014

|

Date of Upload: 22-07-2015

Karnataka

The Secretory,South central railway employment co op credit socity Ltd V/S Yamanursab S/o Rajesab

Railway   Employment  

Court Name: Dharwad

Appelant Advocate M.C.Hittalmani

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/27/20151. Yamanursab S/o RajesabYamanursab S/o Rajesab Hattikolla Danu nagarDharwadKarnataka...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Secretory,South central railway employment co op credit socity LtdThe Secretory,South central railway employment...

Case Number: 27

|

Date of Filing: 21-01-2015

|

Date of Upload: 28-05-2015

Punjab

Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corp. Ltd. V/S Munish Devgan

Railway   Indian Railway  

Court Name: Amritsar

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/14/3621. Munish DevganR/o E 8/106, St no.2, Bhalla Colony, ChhehartaAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Cor...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 07-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-04-2015

Uttar Pradesh

NORTHERN RAILWAY V/S SANJAY K RAO

Railway  

Court Name: Ghaziabad

Appelant Advocate ANJALI SINGH

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/289/20141. SANJAY K RAOD-20 ABHAY KHAND III NEW APARTMENT INDIRAPURAMGHAZIABADUTTAR PRADESH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. NORTHERN RAILWAYNORTHERN RAILWAY BARODA HOUSE NEW DELHIDELHIDELHI............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ...

Case Number: 289

|

Date of Filing: 22-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 27-04-2015

Gujarat

SHRI PANKAJ M VERMA V/S SABARMATI RAILWAY STATION

Railway  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M M MAKHIJA

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 23-01-2015

|

Date of Upload: 15-06-2015

Tamil Nadu

THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY V/S V. SELVAM

Railway  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate V. SELVAM

Respondant Advocate K. KUMARAN

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,CHENNAI BEFORE : THIRU.J.JAYARAM PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER TMT.P.BAKIYAVATHI MEMBER F.A.NO. 196/2012(Against the order in CC.No.64/2010, dated 17.08.2011 on the file of DCDRF, Cud...

Case Number: 196

|

Date of Filing: 22-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 06-05-2015

Uttar Pradesh

Bharat Sangh Railway V/S Surendra Dube

Railway  

Court Name: Gorakhpur

Appelant Advocate Adhasharan Lal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 160

|

Date of Filing: 19-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 07-05-2015

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Railway in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Railway ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.