Railway
Latest Judgments
Total 3750 Consumer Court Cases Against Railway.
NORTH WEST RAILWAY V/S AKHILESH KUMAR
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate ASHOK BISHNOI
Respondant Advocate SHANKAR CHOUHAN
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM JODHPUR FIRSTJODHPURRAJASTHANComplaint Case No. CC/364/20151. AKHILESH KUMAR86D, MALAWIYA NAGAR, GOLF COURS, RATANADA ROAD, JODHPURJODHPURRAJASTHAN...........Complainant(s)Versus1. NORTH WEST RAILWAYHARISH JOSHI MARGH, D.R.M., JODHPURJOD...
Case Number: 364
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2017
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2000
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2017
SHRI.SUDHIR S/O HIMMATLALJI RATHOD V/S THE DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER,CENTRAL RAILWAY
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NITIN LAMBAT
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/14/455(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/08/2014 in Case No. CC/26/2013 of District Gondia)1. THE DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER,CENTRAL RAILWAYCENTRAL RAILWAY,KINGSWAY,NAGPURNAGPUR.......
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2017
SOUTH EASTERN CENTRAL RAILWAY THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER MR.NAVEEN KUMAR TONDON V/S ABHIJEET DIGAMBAR SHIRODKAR
Court Name: Gondia
Appelant Advocate MRS. D. G. DOYE
Respondant Advocate MR. S. B. RAJANKAR
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GONDIAROOM NO. 214, SECOND FLOOR, COLLECTORATE BUILDING,AMGOAN ROAD, GONDIAMAHARASHTRAComplaint Case No. CC/14/711. ABHIJEET DIGAMBAR SHIRODKARR/O.KALPAK KANHAR TOLY, TILAK WARD, GONDIAGONDIAMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2017
Northern Railway V/S Swaran Singh
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/16/6761. Swaran SinghVPO Verka, Mohalla Guru Nagar, House no. 384, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Northern RailwayNew DelhiNew D...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2017
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY & 2 ORS. V/S NISHA JAISWAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH KUMAR BHAWNANI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2662 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 13/07/2016 in Appeal No. 596/2015 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)1. NISHA JAISWALW/O. SHRI RAJKUAMR JAISWAL, ADDRESS QTR. NO. 21/A, STREET AVENUE B, BHILAI, T...
Case Number: 2662
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2017
PRABHANDHAK RAILWAY V/S SHANKAR LAL
Court Name: Alwar
Appelant Advocate PRAVEEN MITTAL
Respondant Advocate SHAILNEDRA BHARGAV
Case Number: 437
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 02-03-2017
RAILWAY V/S SASHANK
Court Name: Kanpur Nagar
Appelant Advocate SC. AGNIHOTRI
Respondant Advocate ASEEM SHUKLA
CONSUMER FORUM KANPUR NAGARTREASURY COMPOUNDComplaint Case No. CC/51/121. SASHANK SISA MAU...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAILWAYKANPUR CENTRL............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. RN. SINGH PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Sudha Yadav MEMBERHON'BLE MR. PURUSHOTTAM SINGH MEMBER For t...
Case Number: 51
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-04-2017
Manoj Krishna Akhouri, The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Dhanbad V/S Deepak Kumar Singh
Court Name: Dhanbad
Appelant Advocate (1) Anil Banerjee (2) Md. Shamim Ahmad
Respondant Advocate Sri Sanjay Kumar
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2020
East Central Railway, through Divisional Railway Manager, Dhanbad V/S Vijay Narayan Singh
Court Name: Dhanbad
Appelant Advocate C. P. Saw
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2020
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Railway in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Railway ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.