Railway
Latest Judgments
Total 3753 Consumer Court Cases Against Railway.
Narender Kumar V/S Railway Mail Service
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dr. U.V. Singh
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/486/2015( Date of Filing : 16 Mar 2015 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/08/2014 in Case No. C/261/2009 of District Rae Bareli)1. Railway Mail Servic...
Case Number: 486
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-09-2019
Sachchidanand Tripathi V/S G.M.North East Railway
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P.P. Srivastva
Respondant Advocate dilip mani
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/481/2016( Date of Filing : 11 Mar 2016 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/02/2016 in Case No. C/77/2013 of District Gorakhpur)1. G.M.North East Railwa...
Case Number: 481
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2019
Supertiendent Railway Station V/S D.D Soni.
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate in person
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Execution Application No. EA/47/2019( Date of Filing : 24 Jun 2019 )InComplaint Case No. 251/20141. D.D Soni.Circular Road Bhiwani...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Supertiendent Railway StationBhiwani...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Parmod Kumar PRESIDING...
Case Number: 47
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2019
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2019
S.D.O.Manager E.C. Railway V/S Shashank Srivastava
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Kumar Srivastava
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/876/2017( Date of Filing : 15 May 2017 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/03/2017 in Case No. C/51/2012 of District Kanpur Nagar)1. Shashank Srivastav...
Case Number: 876
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-09-2019
Station Master, Railway Station Raipur V/S Ku. Rita Ghosh
Court Name: Durg
Appelant Advocate Mr. A.K.Pathak
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 29-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2019
Chief Reservation Supervisor Centrak Railway Akola V/S Suresh Laxman Kurrewar
Court Name: Akola
Appelant Advocate Adv. S B Katkar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2019
DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER,SOUTHERN RAILWAY V/S NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate T.VINOD KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/15/150( Date of Filing : 26 Feb 2015 )1. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDREP BY ITS MANAGER,REGIONAL OFFICE ERNAKULAM...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER,SOUTHERN RAILWAYTRIVANDR...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 23-09-2019
CHIEF MANAGER WEST CENTRAL RAILWAY V/S SANCHITA SHUKLA W/O NILESH SHUKLA AGE 35YRS
Court Name: Satna
Appelant Advocate SATYENDRA AGNIHOTRI
Respondant Advocate SHIVAM SHUKLA
Case Number: 129
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 21-08-2019
Railway V/S Sandeep Mishra
Court Name: Allahabad
Appelant Advocate R.K.Pandey
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/330/2013Sandeep MishraVs.RailwayBEFORE:JUDGES Sukh Lal PRESIDENTSuman Pandey MEMBERFor the Complainant:For the Opp. Party:Dated : 16 Aug 2019Order16.08.2019 पक्षकार पुकार पर अनुपस्थित। ...
Case Number: 330
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-08-2019
THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER V/S BABY JAYA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PARTY IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONTHIRUVANANTHAPURAMFirst Appeal No. A/506/2018( Date of Filing : 01 Sep 2018 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/246/2016 of District Thiruvananthapuram)1. BABY JAYAKIZHAKKEKOLEZHATHU VEEDU VELORVATTOM CHERTHALA...........Appellan...
Case Number: 506
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2019
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Railway in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Railway ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Railway under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.