Raheja
Latest Judgments
Total 237 Consumer Court Cases Against Raheja.
Raheja Developers Ltd V/S Sunita Gupta
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Sh. S.S. Balyan
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2022
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2023
M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED V/S RAJ KUMAR MITTAL & 2 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. MITTAL & MITTAL CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. SHYAM AGARWAL,RAHUL BHARDWAJ, LAVANYA KAUSHIK,ANU SRIVASTAVA & SIDDHARTH BANTHIA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 186 OF 20201. RAJ KUMAR MITTAL & 2 ORS. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED ...........Opp.Party(s)BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE DR. I...
Case Number: 186
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2020
|
Date of Upload: 07-07-2023
M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S KANIKA MALIK & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUKAAM GUPTA & MR. SAVINDER SINGH GILL
Respondant Advocate MR. SIDDHARTH BANTHIA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 3684 OF 2017 1. AJESH KUMAR & ANR.FLAT NO. C-601, 6th FLOOR, PLOT-18, PH-1, SECTOR-10, FAKHRUDDIN APARTMENT, CGHS DWARKA, NEW DELHI - 110 075...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. & ...
Case Number: 3685
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-07-2023
M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. & ANR. V/S AJESH KUMAR & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUKAAM GUPTA & MR. SAVINDER SINGH GILL
Respondant Advocate MR. SIDDHARTH BANTHIA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 3684 OF 2017 1. AJESH KUMAR & ANR.FLAT NO. C-601, 6th FLOOR, PLOT-18, PH-1, SECTOR-10, FAKHRUDDIN APARTMENT, CGHS DWARKA, NEW DELHI - 110 075...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. & ...
Case Number: 3684
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-07-2023
M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S ASHISH VOHRA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RISHABH SANCHETI
Respondant Advocate MR. ABHAY KUMAR, SAURABH MISHRA,HIMANSHU & SIDDHARTH BANTHIA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1099 OF 20171. ASHISH VOHRAS/o. Sh. Om Prakash Vohra, R/o. 3199, Sector - 23, GURGAON - 122017HARYANA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD.Through its Director/M.D. W4D 204/5, Keshav...
Case Number: 1099
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-06-2023
Raheja QBE General Insurance Co. Ltd. V/S Rahulbhai Kiritbhai Vadaliya
Raheja General Insurance Insurance
Court Name: Rajkot Addl
Appelant Advocate K S Rajani
Respondant Advocate N M Shukla
Case Number: 120
|
Date of Filing: 21-02-2022
|
Date of Upload: 22-06-2023
RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. & ANR. V/S RAJEEV KUMAR BHARDWAJ & ANR.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AMAN SINGH BAKHSHI
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 175
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2020
|
Date of Upload: 09-06-2023
Raheja QBE General Insurance Co Ltd V/S Kamleshbhai Balavantray Menta
Raheja General Insurance Insurance
Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural
Appelant Advocate KRUNAL S MEHTA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 704
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2022
|
Date of Upload: 12-06-2023
Raheja Q. B. E. V/S Tilara Jatinbhai Ramjibhai
Court Name: Rajkot Addl
Appelant Advocate M R Bhatti
Respondant Advocate N M Shukla
Case Number: 345
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2022
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2023
RAHEJA DEVELOPERS V/S DR. V.K. MITTAL
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Present Sh. Mohit Mittal Son of the Complainant Sh. Keshav Chauhan Proxy for Sh. Siddharth Banthia Advocate for OPComplainant has filed an order on record of the Hon-ble SCDRC by which ex-parte dated 04/04/2022 has been set-aside. Copy of the order placed on record which directs ...
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2023
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2023
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raheja in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raheja ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Raheja under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.