Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/96/2014Date of Institution:13/02/2014Date of Decision:08/04/2015Dr. Sandeep Raheja son of Sh. Hans Raj Raheja resident of House No.467, Sector 21, Panchkula (Haryana).…..Complain...
Case Number: 96
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision : 11.03.2015Complaint Case No.174/2012Mrs. Sunita RahejaR/o 1/9054, West Rohtas NagarShahdara, New Delhi-110032Mr. Mohinder RahejaR/o 1/9054, West Rohtas NagarShahdar...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-05-2015
Raheja Oriental Insurance Insurance
Court Name: Chanduali
Appelant Advocate Dhirendra Pratap Singh
Respondant Advocate Kamlesh Kumar Mishra
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/21/20131. JAI PAL RAHEJASIGRA VARANASIVARANASIUP...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTDMUGALSRAI CHANDUALIChandauliUP............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. jagdishwar Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Markandey singh MEMBER ...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIRENDER MEHTA
Respondant Advocate MR. T.C. GUPTA & MR. SUSHIL GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 759 OF 2013 IN OP/321/20021. SMT. MEENA RAHEJA & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. DR. PARVEEN GARG & ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMB...
Case Number: 759
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIRENDER MEHTA
Respondant Advocate MR. T.C. GUPTA & MR. SUSHIL GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 321 OF 20021. SMT. MEENA RAHEJA & ANR.W/O LATE SH. SANDEEP KUMAR RAHEJA 123-R ,MODEL TOWN KARNAL(HARYANA)2. KUMARI ANKITA RAHEJAD/O LATE SH. SANDEEP KUMAR RAHEJA123-R,MODEL TOWN KARNAL3. MASTER ANMOL REHA...
Case Number: 321
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2002
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. LALIET KUMAR & MR. DEEPAK VOHRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 306 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 18/02/2013 in Complaint No. 284/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ANKUSH GUPTAS/O. SH. AL GUPTA, R/O. 212 SRINIKETAN, SOCIETY, PLOT NO. 1, SECTOR-7, DWARKA, DELHI-110...
Case Number: 306
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2013
Court Name: Kachchh
Appelant Advocate S.K.Antani
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 01-09-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. R.K. MEHTA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4457 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/07/2012 in Appeal No. 289/2011 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/2147/20131. M/S. BIRD AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD. & ANR.E-9, Connaught Housem Connaught Place, NE...
Case Number: 4457
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-04-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHALABH SINGHAL
Respondant Advocate MR. SUMIT CHANDER
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 728 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 04/09/2012 in Complaint No. 07/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED(FORMERLY RAHEJA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED), W4D, 204/5, KESHAV KUNJ, WES...
Case Number: 728
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 25-02-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. LALIET KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 178 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 14/01/2011 in Complaint No. 284/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ANKUSH GUPTARESIDENT OF 212, SRINIKETAN SOCIETY PLOT NO.1 SECTOR7, DWARA NEW DELHI -110075.............
Case Number: 178
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raheja in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raheja ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Raheja under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.