Raheja
Latest Judgments
Total 243 Consumer Court Cases Against Raheja.
SANJAY KAKKAR V/S RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PRIANKA DALAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 980 of 2015Date of Institution: 13.11.2015Date of Decision : 18.05.20161. M/s Raheja Developers Limited having its office at W4D, 204/05, Keshav Kunj, Carriapa Marg, Western Avenue, Sainik Farms, Ne...
Case Number: 980
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 27-06-2016
RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S BINDIYA SAHI & ANR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PRAVEEN AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments : 11.05.2016Date of Decision : 18.05.2016 Complaint No. 413/16In the matter of:Mrs. Bindiya Sahi,W/o Shri Rishi Sahi,House No.22, Jangpura-A,New Delhi-110014.Rishi Sah...
Case Number: 413
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2016
Aadit Motors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Dheeraj Raheja
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. B.S. Jaglan
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 22-06-2016
M/s Raheja mobile Plaza V/S Satish Kumar Bhanwala S/o Pyare Lal
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate S.P. Sharma
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,SONEPAT. Complaint No.353 of 2015 Instituted on:21.09.2015 Date of order:05.05.2016Satish Kumar Bhanwala son of Pyare Lal, r/o Meham road, Gohana, tehsil Gohana, distt. Sonepat. ...Complainant. Versus1.Raheja Mobile Plaza, ...
Case Number: 353
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-06-2016
M/S PURE EARTH INFR. LTD. V/S SUNIL KANT RAHEJA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision: 22.04.2016Complaint Case No. 313/1999In the matter of:Sh. Sunil Kant RahejaS/o Sh. A.P.Raheja5/41, Punjabi Bagh,New Delhi .........ComplainantVersusM/s Pure Earth ...
Case Number: 313
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-1999
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2016
Himalya Photo Store V/S Dinesh Kumar Raheja
Court Name: Fatehgarh Sahib
Appelant Advocate Sh. M.K.Garg
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FATEHGARH SAHIB.Consumer Complaint No.78 of 2015 Date of institution :01.09.2015 Date of decision :14.03.2016Dinesh Kumar Raheja aged about 40 years son of Ram Lal r/o Ward No.13, Mohalla Dhobian, Bassi Pathana, Tehsil Bassi Pathana...
Case Number: 78
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2016
SMT. MEERA SAXENA V/S M/S RAHEJA DESIGN & CONTRACT LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision: 02.03.2016First Appeal No. 911/2014 In the Matter of: M/s Raheja Design & Contract Ltd. A-201, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi-110030 Through its Authorized Re...
Case Number: 911
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2016
RAHEJA PLAZA PREMISES CO-OPERATIVE SO. LTD. V/S DR. SUNIL GURCHARNLAL GUPTA,
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICTADMINISTRATIVE BLDG, NEAR DR.BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR GARDEN , BANDRA (E), MUMBAI-400051Complaint Case No. CC/378/20141. DR. SUNIL GURCHARNLAL GUPTA,102, RAHEJA PLAZA, OPP. YASH RAJ STUDIOS MUMBAI - 400 053...........Complainan...
Case Number: 378
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2016
Rajasthan Housing Board Through Depty Housing Commissioner V/S Sudershan Lal Raheja S/o Late Atar Chand
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Pramod Kumar
Respondant Advocate Arvind Kumar Sharma
Case Number: 45
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-04-2016
PURNIMA SAMPAT & 10 ORS. V/S SURESH B. RAHEJA & 2 ORS.
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
Case Number: 38
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 25-08-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raheja in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raheja ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Raheja under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.