Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S K Sharma
Respondant Advocate Pratul Srivastava
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2009/1212(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Baby Anusha Rahejaa...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Fiit Jee Ltda.....
Case Number: 2009
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 05-10-2017
Court Name: Hisar
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate B. S. Baswana
Case Number: 352
|
Date of Filing: 15-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-06-2022
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Complaint Case No.:138 of2017Date of Institution:13.07.2017Date of Decision:14.07.2017Parvesh Kumar, HIG 55, Housing Board Colony Kalka Distt. Panchkula (Haryana) ….ComplainantVersusRAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD...
Case Number: 138
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PARDEEP SOLATH
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No.1005 of 2015Date of the Institution:16.11.2015Date of Decision:07.07.20171. Mayank Jain S/o Rakesh Jain,2. Sarita Jain W/o Sh. Vivek Jain.Both R/o H.No.513, Sector-15, Part-1, Gurgaon, Tehsil & Dis...
Case Number: 1005
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 08-01-2018
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC No. – 341/16KRISHAN RAHEJA VS. PARSHVNATH DEVELOPERSDate : 03.05.2017Present : Shri Deepak Vuttsya , Counsel for the complainant Counsel for the complainant stated that he wants to withdraw the complaint. On his request, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn on the po...
Case Number: 341
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-08-2017
Court Name: Faizabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 350
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 03-05-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK
Respondant Advocate MR.CHANDRA SHEKHAR YADAV
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 11 OF 2015 WITH IA/3960/2016,IA/7326/2015,IA/7327/20151. HARWINDER SINGH AHUJAS/o. Arjan Sing, R/o. H.No. 410, Sector - 125, Near Suny Enclave, KhararMohali...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH LTD. T...
Case Number: 208
|
Date of Filing: 24-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sakshi
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal,Adv.
At the time of arguments, it is stated by Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties, on getting instructions from the Company Executive, that towards settlement of all claims of the complainants, the Opposite Parties shall pay an amount of Rs.2,30,000/- t...
Case Number: 687
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2017
Court Name: Jaipur-II
Appelant Advocate Davinder Mohan
Respondant Advocate Ashutosh
Case Number: 92
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2017
Court Name: Indore-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1669
|
Date of Filing: 05-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raheja in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raheja ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Raheja under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.