company-name-logo

Raheja

Latest Judgments

Total 243 Consumer Court Cases Against Raheja.

Uttar Pradesh

Fiit Jee Ltd V/S Baby Anusha Raheja

Raheja  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S K Sharma

Respondant Advocate Pratul Srivastava

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2009/1212(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Baby Anusha Rahejaa...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Fiit Jee Ltda.....

Case Number: 2009

|

Date of Filing: 20-07-2009

|

Date of Upload: 05-10-2017

Haryana

BSNL V/S Naresh Raheja

Bsnl   Raheja  

Court Name: Hisar

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate B. S. Baswana

Case Number: 352

|

Date of Filing: 15-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-06-2022

Haryana

RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S PARVESH KUMAR.

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Complaint Case No.:138 of2017Date of Institution:13.07.2017Date of Decision:14.07.2017Parvesh Kumar, HIG 55, Housing Board Colony Kalka Distt. Panchkula (Haryana) ….ComplainantVersusRAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD...

Case Number: 138

|

Date of Filing: 13-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 17-07-2017

Haryana

RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S MAYANK JAIN

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate PARDEEP SOLATH

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No.1005 of 2015Date of the Institution:16.11.2015Date of Decision:07.07.20171. Mayank Jain S/o Rakesh Jain,2. Sarita Jain W/o Sh. Vivek Jain.Both R/o H.No.513, Sector-15, Part-1, Gurgaon, Tehsil & Dis...

Case Number: 1005

|

Date of Filing: 26-11-2015

|

Date of Upload: 08-01-2018

Delhi

PARASNATH DEV. V/S KRISHAN RAHEJA

Raheja  

Court Name: East Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CC No. – 341/16KRISHAN RAHEJA VS. PARSHVNATH DEVELOPERSDate : 03.05.2017Present : Shri Deepak Vuttsya , Counsel for the complainant Counsel for the complainant stated that he wants to withdraw the complaint. On his request, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn on the po...

Case Number: 341

|

Date of Filing: 11-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 25-08-2017

Uttar Pradesh

Sri Ram Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. V/S Roopchandra Raheja

Raheja  

Court Name: Faizabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 350

|

Date of Filing: 11-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 03-05-2017

NCDRC

M/S. UNITECH LIMITED V/S HARISH CHANDER RAHEJA & ANR.

Unitech   Raheja  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK

Respondant Advocate MR.CHANDRA SHEKHAR YADAV

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 11 OF 2015 WITH IA/3960/2016,IA/7326/2015,IA/7327/20151. HARWINDER SINGH AHUJAS/o. Arjan Sing, R/o. H.No. 410, Sector - 125, Near Suny Enclave, KhararMohali...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH LTD. T...

Case Number: 208

|

Date of Filing: 24-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 06-04-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. ltd, V/S Sushma Raheja and anr.

Omaxe   Raheja  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sakshi

Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal,Adv.

At the time of arguments, it is stated by Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties, on getting instructions from the Company Executive, that towards settlement of all claims of the complainants, the Opposite Parties shall pay an amount of Rs.2,30,000/- t...

Case Number: 687

|

Date of Filing: 13-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 05-04-2017

Rajasthan

RAHEJA DIJAYAN V/S O P BIRLA

Raheja  

Court Name: Jaipur-II

Appelant Advocate Davinder Mohan

Respondant Advocate Ashutosh

Case Number: 92

|

Date of Filing: 31-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-03-2017

Madhya Pradesh

BHARTIYA GEEVAN BEEMA NIGAM V/S INDR KUMAR RAHEJA

Raheja  

Court Name: Indore-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1669

|

Date of Filing: 05-12-2009

|

Date of Upload: 16-04-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raheja in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raheja ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Raheja under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.