Raheja
Latest Judgments
Total 243 Consumer Court Cases Against Raheja.
Spicejet Ltd. V/S Prasang Raheja
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Prasang Raheja
Respondant Advocate
Before the Lok Adalat held in District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 19 OF 2018Prasang Raheja Vs SpiceJet Ltd. BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER DEV RAJ, MEMBER LOK ADALATPRESENT: Complainant in person.None ...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2018
M/S ADEL LANDMARKS (INDIA) LTD. V/S MRS. HENA RAHEJA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAVI PRABHA
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Hearing: 13.09.2018 Date of decision:14.09.2018Complaint No. 1081/2018IN THE MATTER OF:Mrs. Hena Raheja,R/o A-3/78, Pocket A-3,Rohini, Sector-3Delhi-110085 ….Complaina...
Case Number: 1081
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 06-10-2018
Om Prakash Raheja s/o Hari Ram Raheja V/S Reliance Life Insurance Comapany Limited
Reliance Raheja Life Insurance Life Insurance Insurance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vinay Mathur
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1FIRST APPEAL NO: 43 /2018Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. through Manager Claim Deptt., Reliance House, 6th floor, Nagambackaham, Chennai & ors.Vs.Omprakash Raheja s/o Hariram Raheja r/o S/15/C Mahav...
Case Number: 43
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 13-08-2018
M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED & ANR. V/S PAWAN KUMAR & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HARIKESH SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1402 OF 20161. PAWAN KUMAR & ANR.DHARUHERA,DIST. REWARI.DIST. REWARI.2. PARVEEN KUMARDHARUHERA, DIST-REWARI.REWARI............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANAGIN...
Case Number: 1402
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-06-2018
Case Number: 184
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 08-06-2018
1.Cherukupally Nageshwara Rao, Son of Vekatratnam, Age 29 Years, Occ Nil, V/S TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited, Raheja Towers,
Tata Aig General Insurance Raheja General Insurance Tata Insurance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms.N. Mohan Krishna
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaFirst Appeal No. A/316/2014( Date of Filing : 22 May 2014 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/04/2014 in Case No. CC/19/2008 of District Nalgonda)1. TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited, Raheja Towers, 9th Floor, Betawing, 177, Ann...
Case Number: 316
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 01-09-2018
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. V/S M/s Raheja Collection
Reliance Reliance General Insurance Raheja General Insurance Insurance
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Kamal Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-07-2018
Raheja Developers Ltd. V/S Sunil Kumar
Court Name: Rewari
Appelant Advocate Sh. M.K. Chakarwarti
Respondant Advocate Sh. Anil Yadav
Case Number: 328
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2018
RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S RAM NIWAS SHARMA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NEERAJ GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No. 413 of 2016Date of Institution: 20.12.2016Date of Decision: 21.03.2018Ram Niwas Sharma son of Shri Hari Kishan Sharma, resident of House No.430/20, Shanti Nagar, Gurgaon (Haryana.).…..Complainan...
Case Number: 413
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2018
S.L. RAHEJA HOSPITAL & 5 ORS. V/S SUMATI MILIND DHANU & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. VIPIN B. KUMAR & MR. HEMANT B. KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 295 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 28/11/2017 in Complaint No. 364/2017 of the State Commission Maharashtra)1. SUMATI MILIND DHANU & ANR.R/O. 502, 5TH FLOOR, MAULI CHS, MORI ROAD, MAHIM WEST.MUMBAI-4000162...
Case Number: 295
|
Date of Filing: 21-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raheja in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raheja ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Raheja under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.