company-name-logo

Raheja

Latest Judgments

Total 243 Consumer Court Cases Against Raheja.

Haryana

M/s Raheja Developers Ltd. &Others V/S Monika Gupta W/o Himanshu Gupta

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: Faridabad

Appelant Advocate V P singh

Respondant Advocate

Distic forum Faridabad, hariyanafaridabadfinal orderComplaint Case No. CC/402/2022( Date of Filing : 29 Jul 2022 )1. Monika Gupta W/o Himanshu GuptaH. No. 207, First Floor, Sec-16, FBD...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Raheja Developers Ltd. &Others317, Raheja Mall 3rd Floor.....

Case Number: 402

|

Date of Filing: 29-07-2022

|

Date of Upload: 18-11-2022

Haryana

Raheja Developers Ltd and Other V/S Narayan Dass Gupta

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: Gurgaon

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate None

Case Number: 63

|

Date of Filing: 16-07-2019

|

Date of Upload: 08-10-2022

Gujarat

Raheja QBE General Insurance Co. Ltd. V/S Bhavdipkumar Kishorbhai Viradiya

Raheja   General Insurance   Insurance  

Court Name: Rajkot Addl

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 106

|

Date of Filing: 15-02-2022

|

Date of Upload: 12-09-2022

Madhya Pradesh

M/S RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S DHAWAL SONI

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: Dhar

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 95

|

Date of Filing: 05-05-2022

|

Date of Upload: 10-08-2022

Haryana

Raheja Developers Ltd. V/S Mukesh Tyagi & Anr.

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: Gurgaon

Appelant Advocate Sh. Tanuj Aggarwal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 611

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2022

|

Date of Upload: 05-08-2022

Haryana

Raheja Mobiles V/S M/s Himgiri Industries

Raheja  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Jain

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/21/637( Date of Filing : 25 Oct 2021 )1. M/s Himgiri Industries170, HSIIDC, Kutana, Rohtak through its Partner Vikas Bansal............Complainant(s)Versus1. Raheja Mobilesnear Luxmi Bikaner Mis...

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 25-10-2021

|

Date of Upload: 04-08-2022

Haryana

The Panipat Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. V/S Harish Raheja

Raheja  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajpal Rindan Kashyap

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 204

|

Date of Filing: 15-07-2022

|

Date of Upload: 20-07-2022

Haryana

Jeeves Consumers Services Private Limited V/S Madhav Raheja

Raheja   Jeeves  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Suresh Kumar Raheja

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No. 384 of 2021 Date of instt.06.08.2021 Date of Decision:04.07.2022Madhav Raheja son of Shri Suresh Kumar, resident of House no.11, Krishna Nagar, near Aghi Park, Karnal Aadhar no.792127918183 mobile ...

Case Number: 384

|

Date of Filing: 06-08-2021

|

Date of Upload: 07-07-2022

NCDRC

RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S A. MALATHI

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANANT AGARWAL,SAVINDER SINGH GILL & SWETA RANI

Respondant Advocate MR. SHYAM AGARWAL,RAHUL BHARDWAJ, LAVANYA KAUSHIK & ANU SRIVASTAVA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 2014 OF 2019 1. A. MALATHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR HAVING ITS REGD OFFICE AT W4D, 204/5, KESHAV KUNM, WESTERN AVENUE, SAINIK FARMS, NEW DELHI-11...

Case Number: 2014

|

Date of Filing: 10-10-2019

|

Date of Upload: 14-06-2022

Haryana

PNB Metlife India Insurance Company Ltd. V/S Ankur Raheja

Pnb Metlife India Insurance   Raheja   Insurance  

Court Name: Hisar

Appelant Advocate Ms. Sheela Rathi

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 575

|

Date of Filing: 03-12-2021

|

Date of Upload: 27-06-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raheja in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raheja ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Raheja under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.