Raheja Developers
Latest Judgments
Total 101 Consumer Court Cases Against Raheja Developers.
Raheja Developers Ltd and Other V/S Narayan Dass Gupta
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 519
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2019
Raheja Developers Ltd V/S Sunita Gupta
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Sh Ajay Pal Singh
Respondant Advocate Sh Arun Kumar Dayma
Case Number: 566
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2019
M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED & ANR. V/S PAWAN KUMAR & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HARIKESH SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1402 OF 20161. PAWAN KUMAR & ANR.DHARUHERA,DIST. REWARI.DIST. REWARI.2. PARVEEN KUMARDHARUHERA, DIST-REWARI.REWARI............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANAGIN...
Case Number: 1402
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-06-2018
Raheja Developers Ltd. V/S Sunil Kumar
Court Name: Rewari
Appelant Advocate Sh. M.K. Chakarwarti
Respondant Advocate Sh. Anil Yadav
Case Number: 328
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2018
RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S RAM NIWAS SHARMA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NEERAJ GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No. 413 of 2016Date of Institution: 20.12.2016Date of Decision: 21.03.2018Ram Niwas Sharma son of Shri Hari Kishan Sharma, resident of House No.430/20, Shanti Nagar, Gurgaon (Haryana.).…..Complainan...
Case Number: 413
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2018
M/S RAHEJA DEVELOPERS V/S VIJAY KUMAR GORIYA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANJEEV SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No. 795 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 08.12.2017 Date of Decision: 30.01.20181. Vijay Kumar Goriya son of Shri Om Parkash Goriya,2. Urvashi wife of Vijay Kumar Goriya, Both residents of House No.2...
Case Number: 795
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-02-2018
RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S CHAROO BINDLE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANJEEV SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Consumer Complaint No. 211 of 2016 Date of Institution 04.08.2016 Date of Decision 01.12.2017Charoo Bindle wife of Sh. Rahul Bindle, resident of E-303, Park View City-1, Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana.ComplainantV...
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2018
M/S. K. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD, V/S VERSOVA ASHIRWAD C.H.S. LTD
Court Name: Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate NO
Respondant Advocate Arjun N Motwani
Addl. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mumbai Suburban DistrictAdmin Bldg., 3rd floor, Nr. Chetana College, Bandra-East, Mumbai-51Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/11/4151. VERSOVA ASHIRWAD C.H.S. LTDSEVEN BUNGLOWS, VERSOVA, ANDHERI-WEST, MUMBAI-61............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S AMIT KANWAR HUF
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PARMANAND YADAV & MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1985 OF 20171. AMIT KANWAR HUFD-124, MANSAROVER GARDEN.NEW DELHI-110015...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD.THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR. 406, 4TH FLOOR, RECTANGLE 1, D-4, DISTRICT CEN...
Case Number: 1985
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2017
RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S PARVESH KUMAR.
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Complaint Case No.:138 of2017Date of Institution:13.07.2017Date of Decision:14.07.2017Parvesh Kumar, HIG 55, Housing Board Colony Kalka Distt. Panchkula (Haryana) ….ComplainantVersusRAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD...
Case Number: 138
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-07-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raheja Developers in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raheja Developers ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Raheja Developers under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.