company-name-logo

Raheja Developers

Latest Judgments

Total 109 Consumer Court Cases Against Raheja Developers.

Delhi

BMW INDIA PRIVATE LTD.& ANR. V/S RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD.

Bmw   Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986Complaint Case No. CC/11/289( Date of Filing : 07 Sep 2011 )1. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD.215-216 RECTANGLE ONE D-4 DISTRICT CENTRE SAKET NEW DELHI-17...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BMW INDI...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 07-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 29-12-2020

NCDRC

RAHEJA DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. V/S PRATEEK KUMAR JAIN

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SAMEER KULSHRESHTA

Respondant Advocate MR. VEDANTA VARMA, VIBHOR KUSH, SANAT TOKAS & AKHIL KUMAR GOLA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 2318 OF 20171. PRATEEK KUMAR JAINS/O LATE VINOD KUMAR JAIN B-1804, ATS HACIENDAS, AHINSA KHAND 1, INDIRAPURAM,GHAZIABAD-201014UTTAR PRADESH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.OFFIC...

Case Number: 2318

|

Date of Filing: 08-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 10-02-2020

NCDRC

M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED V/S VISHESH SOOD & ANR.

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH SOOD (GPA)

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 2923 OF 20171. VISHESH SOOD & ANR............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED THROUGH ITS MD, #406, 4TH FLOOR, RECTANGLE 1, D-4, DISTRICT CENTRE, SAKET, NEW DELHI-1100117...........Opp...

Case Number: 2923

|

Date of Filing: 04-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 19-11-2019

NCDRC

MANAGING DIRECTOR/WHOLE TIME DIRECTOR/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED & ANR. V/S BINDIYA SAHI & ANR.

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRAVEEN AGARWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 866 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 18/05/2016 in Complaint No. 413/2016 of the State Commission Delhi)1. BINDIYA SAHI & ANR.W/O. SHRI RISHI SAHI, HOUSE NO. 22 JANGPURA-A, NEW DELHI-1100142. RISHI SAHIS/O. ...

Case Number: 866

|

Date of Filing: 08-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 26-09-2019

Haryana

Raheja Developers Ltd and Others V/S Ms. Anju

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: Gurgaon

Appelant Advocate Smt. Sukhdev Singh Sethi

Respondant Advocate Sh. Arun Kumar Dayma

Case Number: 615

|

Date of Filing: 24-12-2018

|

Date of Upload: 17-05-2019

Haryana

RAHEJA DEVELOPERS PVT. V/S SANJIV SHARMA

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate AMIT CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Consumer Complaint No : 81 of 2017Date of Institution: 19.02.2018 Date of Decision : 26.02.2019Sanjiv Sharma son of Sh. Ram Kumar Vyas, resident of House No.347, Sector 10A, Gurgaon. ComplainantVersusThe Managing...

Case Number: 81

|

Date of Filing: 21-02-2018

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2019

NCDRC

M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S MAYUR SARAF

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PAWAN KUMAR RAY

Respondant Advocate M/S. LEX JURIS

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 988 OF 20161. MAYUR SARAFA-428, SARITA VIHAR, NEW DELHI-110076...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD.406, RECTANGLE ONE, D-4, DISTRICT CENTRE, SAKET, NEW DELHI-110017NEW DELHI-110076....

Case Number: 988

|

Date of Filing: 06-06-2016

|

Date of Upload: 21-02-2019

Delhi

RAHEJA DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. V/S USHA RANJAN MITRA

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate KRISH KALRA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1617

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2018

|

Date of Upload: 08-02-2019

Haryana

Raheja Developers Ltd and Other V/S Narayan Dass Gupta

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: Gurgaon

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 519

|

Date of Filing: 16-10-2018

|

Date of Upload: 15-01-2019

Haryana

Raheja Developers Ltd V/S Sunita Gupta

Raheja   Raheja Developers  

Court Name: Gurgaon

Appelant Advocate Sh Ajay Pal Singh

Respondant Advocate Sh Arun Kumar Dayma

Case Number: 566

|

Date of Filing: 06-11-2018

|

Date of Upload: 15-01-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raheja Developers in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raheja Developers ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Raheja Developers under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.