Raheja Developers
Latest Judgments
Total 101 Consumer Court Cases Against Raheja Developers.
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2022
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2022
Raheja Developers Ltd. V/S Mukesh Tyagi & Anr.
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Sh. Tanuj Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 611
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2022
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2022
RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S A. MALATHI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANANT AGARWAL,SAVINDER SINGH GILL & SWETA RANI
Respondant Advocate MR. SHYAM AGARWAL,RAHUL BHARDWAJ, LAVANYA KAUSHIK & ANU SRIVASTAVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 2014 OF 2019 1. A. MALATHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR HAVING ITS REGD OFFICE AT W4D, 204/5, KESHAV KUNM, WESTERN AVENUE, SAINIK FARMS, NEW DELHI-11...
Case Number: 2014
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2022
Raheja Developers Ltd. & others V/S Jagattaran Das
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Himanshu Raj
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 225
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2020
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2022
M/s Raheja Developers Ltd V/S Sandeep Gandheer
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Shri Sushil Kaushik
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 579
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2021
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2022
RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S CHARU SHARMA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. PSP LEGAL
Respondant Advocate MR. SHYAM AGARWAL,RAHUL BHARDWAJ, LAVANYA KAUSHIK & ANU SRIVASTAVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 728 OF 2020 1. CHARU SHARMA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD............Opp.Party(s) CONSUMER CASE NO. 729 OF 2020 1. PARAMJEET SINGH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAHEJA DEVELOPER...
Case Number: 728
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2020
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2022
RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S PARAMJEET SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. PSP LEGAL
Respondant Advocate MR. SHYAM AGARWAL,RAHUL BHARDWAJ, LAVANYA KAUSHIK & ANU SRIVASTAVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 728 OF 2020 1. CHARU SHARMA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD............Opp.Party(s) CONSUMER CASE NO. 729 OF 2020 1. PARAMJEET SINGH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAHEJA DEVELOPER...
Case Number: 729
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2020
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2022
RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S SUDHIR BAGGA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. PSP LEGAL
Respondant Advocate MR. SHYAM AGARWAL,RAHUL BHARDWAJ, LAVANYA KAUSHIK & ANU SRIVASTAVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 728 OF 2020 1. CHARU SHARMA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD............Opp.Party(s) CONSUMER CASE NO. 729 OF 2020 1. PARAMJEET SINGH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAHEJA DEVELOPER...
Case Number: 730
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2020
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2022
RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S SISIRA KANT DASH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. PSP LEGAL
Respondant Advocate MR. SHYAM AGARWAL,RAHUL BHARDWAJ, LAVANYA KAUSHIK & ANU SRIVASTAVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 728 OF 2020 1. CHARU SHARMA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD............Opp.Party(s) CONSUMER CASE NO. 729 OF 2020 1. PARAMJEET SINGH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAHEJA DEVELOPER...
Case Number: 731
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2020
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2022
RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. V/S GIRISH JOHAR & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. PSP LEGAL
Respondant Advocate MR. SHYAM AGARWAL,RAHUL BHARDWAJ, LAVANYA KAUSHIK & ANU SRIVASTAVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 728 OF 2020 1. CHARU SHARMA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD............Opp.Party(s) CONSUMER CASE NO. 729 OF 2020 1. PARAMJEET SINGH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RAHEJA DEVELOPER...
Case Number: 732
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2020
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2022
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Raheja Developers in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Raheja Developers ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Raheja Developers under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.