Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Moushmi Mittal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 207
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. C.K.SUCHARITA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2871 OF 2005(Against the Order dated 05/03/2005 in Appeal No. 23/2005 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYPUDA BHAWAN PHASE VIII MOHALI PUNJAB...........Petitioner(s)Ver...
Case Number: 2871
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2005
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2016
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amardeep Singh Gill
Respondant Advocate -
Case Number: 818
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2016
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Kumar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1104
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 10-02-2016
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate HARVINDER KAUR CHAWDHARY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 482 OF 2014 IN RP/1561/20141. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)...........Appellants(s)Versus1. KAMLESH RANI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRE...
Case Number: 482
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2014
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. HARVINDER KAUR CHAWDHARY
Respondant Advocate MR. KIRAN KUMAR & MR. KARAN DEWAN & MS. AANCHAL JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1561 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 30/05/2013 in Appeal No. 1607/2009 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)PUDA COMPLEX, OPP TEHSIL COMPLEX, JALANDHAR, THROUGH I...
Case Number: 1561
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-09-2014
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 351 OF 2013 IN RP/2940/20131. BALBIR SINGH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA) & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTIC...
Case Number: 351
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2013
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3382 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/05/2012 in Appeal No. 1546/2010 of the State Commission Punjab)1. ESTATE OFFICER, PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYSCO No-41 Ladowali RoadJalandharPunjab2. Punj...
Case Number: 3382
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-10-2013
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2940 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 26/03/2013 in Appeal No. 131/2008 of the State Commission Punjab)1. BALBIR SINGHS/O SH.RANJIT SINGH, R/O H.NO 5471/3 MODERN HOUSING, COMPLEX, MANI MAJRACHANDIGARH -...
Case Number: 2940
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2013
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ANIL AMRIT & ASSO.
Respondant Advocate MR. ATUL NANDA, ADVOCATE
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 136 OF 20031. THE DANGRA PIRAT COOP4552-B , SECTOR -70 SAS NAGAR (MOHALI)ROPARPUNJAB...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through Its Chief Administrator, Sector 17,Chandigar...
Case Number: 136
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2003
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Punjab Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Punjab Urban Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Punjab Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.