Punjab Urban Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 95 Consumer Court Cases Against Punjab Urban Development Authority.
Punjab Urban Development Authority PUDA V/S Sudeep Sachdeva
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 626
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-09-2017
Punjab Urban Development Authority PUDA V/S K.L.Sachdeva
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 625
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-09-2017
Punjab Urban Development Authority PUDA V/S Surinder Kaur
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kulwinder Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 134
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-08-2017
Punjab Urban Development Authority PUDA V/S Amandeep Goyal
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 169
|
Date of Filing: 24-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2019
Punjab Urban Development Authority (PUDA) V/S Amrit Paul Goyal
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate Sh S K Singla
Respondant Advocate Sh N K Shamra
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-07-2017
Punjab Urban Development Authority (PUDA) V/S Navneet Singla
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate Sh S K Singla
Respondant Advocate Sh N K Sharma
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-07-2017
Punjab Urban Development Authority V/S Mr. John T.G.
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. Banni Thomas Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :16/05/2017ORDER Today, none has turned up on behalf of complainant / decree holder. On the last three dates also none appeared on behalf of the complainant. Case has been called several times since morning. Accordingly, the application under Section 25 of the Consumer Pro...
Case Number: 47
|
Date of Filing: 23-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2017
Punjab Urban Development Authority PUDA V/S Vivek Sharma
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Krishan Sehajpal
Respondant Advocate
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.477 of 2015 Date of Institution: 05.05.2015 Order Reserved on :12.05.2017 Date of Decision : 15.05.2017Vivek Sha...
Case Number: 477
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2017
HARPAL SINGH V/S PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate MS. SHIKHA ROY, MR. AJAY K. SINGH, MR. I.K. KAPILA, MR. SURINDER SINGH & HARKISHAN SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1870 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 01/10/2013 in Appeal No. 1609/2009 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/2634/20141. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.PATIALA THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTR...
Case Number: 1871
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2017
HARPAL SINGH V/S PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate MS. SHIKHA ROY, MR. A.K. SINGH, MR. SURINDER SINGH, MR. I.K. KAPILA & MR. HARKISHAN SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1870 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 01/10/2013 in Appeal No. 1609/2009 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/2634/20141. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.PATIALA THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTR...
Case Number: 1870
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Punjab Urban Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Punjab Urban Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Punjab Urban Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.