Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gagan Anand, Parveen Moudgil , Shivali Jain, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:170 of 2015Date of Institution:14.08.2015Date of Decision:01.04.2016Abha Arora wife of Sh.Rakesh Arora, House No.157, Sector 27-A, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sPuma Realtors Pvt. L...
Case Number: 173
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gagan Anand, Parveen Moudgil & Shivali Jain
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:170 of 2015Date of Institution:14.08.2015Date of Decision:01.04.2016Abha Arora wife of Sh.Rakesh Arora, House No.157, Sector 27-A, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sPuma Realtors Pvt. L...
Case Number: 176
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gagan Anand Parveen Moudgil & Shivali Jain
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:170 of 2015Date of Institution:14.08.2015Date of Decision:01.04.2016Abha Arora wife of Sh.Rakesh Arora, House No.157, Sector 27-A, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sPuma Realtors Pvt. L...
Case Number: 177
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:170 of 2015Date of Institution:14.08.2015Date of Decision:01.04.2016Abha Arora wife of Sh.Rakesh Arora, House No.157, Sector 27-A, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sPuma Realtors Pvt. L...
Case Number: 182
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:170 of 2015Date of Institution:14.08.2015Date of Decision:01.04.2016Abha Arora wife of Sh.Rakesh Arora, House No.157, Sector 27-A, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sPuma Realtors Pvt. L...
Case Number: 209
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:170 of 2015Date of Institution:14.08.2015Date of Decision:01.04.2016Abha Arora wife of Sh.Rakesh Arora, House No.157, Sector 27-A, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sPuma Realtors Pvt. L...
Case Number: 213
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajbir Singh Guron & Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:170 of 2015Date of Institution:14.08.2015Date of Decision:01.04.2016Abha Arora wife of Sh.Rakesh Arora, House No.157, Sector 27-A, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sPuma Realtors Pvt. L...
Case Number: 214
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gagan Anand, Parveen Moudgil, Vishal Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:170 of 2015Date of Institution:14.08.2015Date of Decision:01.04.2016Abha Arora wife of Sh.Rakesh Arora, House No.157, Sector 27-A, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sPuma Realtors Pvt. L...
Case Number: 231
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:170 of 2015Date of Institution:14.08.2015Date of Decision:01.04.2016Abha Arora wife of Sh.Rakesh Arora, House No.157, Sector 27-A, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sPuma Realtors Pvt. L...
Case Number: 265
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Aftab Singh Khara, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
Counsel for the Judgment Debtors/Opposite Parties has handed over two post dated cheques bearing No.001326 and 001327, both dated 15.06.2016, in the sum of Rs.17,65,966/- each and two post-dated cheques bearing No.001328 and 001329, both dated 15.07.2016, in the sum of Rs.17,...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.