Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 626 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Ritesh Trikha
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:81 of 2016Date of Institution:02.03.2016Date of Decision:15.07.2016Ritesh Trikha S/o Sh. Sudesh Trikha, resident of #5672, Sector 38 (West), Chandigarh.Nidhi Trikha W/o Sh. Ritesh Trikha, resident of ...
Case Number: 81
|
Date of Filing: 02-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-07-2016
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Vikas Nijhawan
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/101/20161. Vikas NijhawanS/o Sh. Subhash Nijhawan, R/o H.No. 18, Shanti Nagar, Model Town, Panipat, Hr............Complainant(s)Versus1. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.a Company incorporated under the Companie...
Case Number: 101
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2016
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Parveen Mangla
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:79 of 2016Date of Institution:01.03.2016Date of Decision:08.07.2016Parveen Mangla son of Sh. Subhash Mangla R/o House No.1757, Nirwana Society, Sector 49-B, Chandigarh.……Complainant.Vers...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2016
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Upvinder Singh Dhall
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:80 of 2016Date of Institution:02.03.2016Date of Decision:08.07.2016Upvinder Singh Dhall S/o Sh. Upkar Singh Dhall,Davinder Kaur Dhall W/o Sh. Upvinder Singh Dhall,Both residents of H.No.2234, Second ...
Case Number: 80
|
Date of Filing: 02-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2016
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Deepak Saluja
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:82 of 2016Date of Institution:02.03.2016Date of Decision:08.07.2016Deepak Saluja S/o Sh. O. P. Saluja,Anureet Saluja W/o Sh. Deepak Saluja,Both residents of 3240/2, Sector 40-D, Chandigarh.…&h...
Case Number: 82
|
Date of Filing: 02-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2016
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd, V/S Timple Jain
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar & Varun Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:09 of 2016Date of Institution:04.01.2016Date of Decision:27.06.2016Hardeep Kaur wife of Sh.Amrit Pal Singh, through Attorney Amrit Pal Singh, resident of House No.227, Ajit Nagar, Part 2, Patiala.Rame...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2016
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd, V/S Hardeep Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar & Varun Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:09 of 2016Date of Institution:04.01.2016Date of Decision:27.06.2016Hardeep Kaur wife of Sh.Amrit Pal Singh, through Attorney Amrit Pal Singh, resident of House No.227, Ajit Nagar, Part 2, Patiala.Rame...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2016
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Paramjit Kaur Sachar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:95 of 2016Date of Institution:14.03.2016Date of Decision:24.06.2016Paramjit Kaur Sachar, Aged 76 years, wife of Col. D. S. Sachar (Retd.), resident of Kothi No.47, Phase 3B1, Mohali, Punjab – 16...
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-06-2016
M/s Puma Retailers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Vijepal Singh Mann
Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali
Appelant Advocate Varun Katyal
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/14/4551. Vijepal Singh MannS/o Late Col. Jaswant S.Mann, R/o H. No.1306, Sector 44 B, Chandigarh............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Puma Retailers Pvt. Ltd.having its Corporate Office at SCO No. 6-8, Ist and 2nd Floor, Sector 9-D, Chandiga...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 07-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-06-2016
M/s Puma Realtors Private Ltd. V/S Karan Pal Kandhari
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Munish Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated : 25/05/2016ORDER Sh. Munish Bhardwaj, counsel for the complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately: - “Due to technical defect, I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant reserves his right...
Case Number: 362
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.