Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 626 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ankur Dada
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
It is stated by counsel for both the parties that the dispute, between the parties, stands settled. In view of above, Sh. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made cl...
Case Number: 431
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Sandeep Goyal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:339 of 2016Date of Institution:08.07.2016Date of Decision:07.10.2016Sandeep Goyal son of Sh.Rajinder Goyal, resident of House No.3263, Sector 21-D, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sM/s...
Case Number: 339
|
Date of Filing: 08-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-10-2016
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Veena Gupta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:123 of 2016Date of Institution:30.03.2016Date of Decision:03.10.2016Veena Gupta wife of Sh. Rajinder Gupta, presently resident of House No.1025, Sector 4, Panchkula.……Complainant.VersusM...
Case Number: 123
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2016
PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Ashish Arora
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar & Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:229 of 2016Date of Institution:24.05.2016Date of Decision:03.10.2016Ashish Arora, Aged 43 years son of Sh. M. G. Arora, Resident of House No.647, Sector 9, Panchkula.……Complainant.Versus...
Case Number: 229
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2016
Puma Realtors Pvt.Ltd. V/S Mr.Deepak Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gagan Anand, Parveen Moudgil, Rajat Chopra,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:281 of 2016Date of Institution:23.06.2016Date of Decision:30.09.2016Mr.Deepak Kumar son of Puran Chand, R/o House No.56, Khalapur Hanuman Road, Gali Khatiyon, Shamli, Uttar Pradesh.……Com...
Case Number: 281
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2016
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd., & Others V/S Mr. Haravtar Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil Adv. & Rajat Chopra Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this compliant with liberty to file the same before the competent Commission. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Office is directed to prepare one photocopy of the main...
Case Number: 609
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd., & Others V/S Mr. Haravtar Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil Adv. & Rajat Chopra Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this compliant with liberty to file the same before the competent Commission. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Office is directed to prepare one photocopy of the main...
Case Number: 610
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Rajinder Chaudhary
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Harsh Garg, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the partie...
Case Number: 604
|
Date of Filing: 20-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
PUMA Realtors V/S Rajinder Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh, Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:150 of 2016Date of Institution:20.04.2016Date of Decision:20.09.2016Rajinder Singh s/o Late Sh. Ajit Singh R/o House No.1179, Sector 43-B, Chandigarh.Bhajan Kaur w/o Sh. Rajinder Singh, r/o House No.1...
Case Number: 150
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-09-2016
PUMA Realtors Pvt Ltd. V/S Mohinder Singh Bajaj
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:237 of 2016Date of Institution:27.05.2016Date of Decision:19.09.2016Mohinder Singh Bajaj S/o Sh. Harbans Singh Bajaj R/o House No.63, Sector 9-A, Chandigarh.……Complainant.VersusM/s Puma ...
Case Number: 237
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.