Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Varun Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Rohit Tanwar, representative
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:21 of 2017Date of Institution:09.01.2017Date of Decision:18.01.2017Ashoo Tuli son of Sh.N.C. Tuli, resident of House No.26, Doctor’s Enclave, Stadium Road, GPO Distt. Patiala-147001.Amandeep Sin...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: Udaipur
Appelant Advocate Rajendra Kumar
Respondant Advocate None
Case Number: 375
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:555 of 2016Date of Institution:07.09.2016Date of Decision:12.01.2017Mrs. Asha Viz w/o Mr. Chand Parkash Vij R/o House No.129-R, Model Town and presently residing at House No.89, Late No.-2, Friends Co...
Case Number: 555
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:456 of 2016Date of Institution:12.08.2016Date of Decision:11.01.2017Mrs.Mansi Khanna wife of Sh.Kabir KhannaSh.Kabir Khanna son of Sh.V.B. KhannaCorrespondence address: House No.1747, Sector 4, Panchk...
Case Number: 456
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 11-01-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate S.M Wadehra Adv.
Respondant Advocate M.S.Bajwa,Adv Ashok Kumar,Adv
Dated :26/12/2016ORDER Sh. S.M. Wadhera, counsel for the complainants has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that in view of the judgment of Ambrish Kumar Shukla (NC), he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh before the appropriate Forum. In view of ...
Case Number: 61
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Aggarwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the Decree Holders/complainants wishes to withdraw this Execution Application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. In view of above, the Execution Application is dismissed as withdrawn. On subm...
Case Number: 166
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/110/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/9/20161. Hardeep KaurPatiala............Appellant(s)Versus1. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd,Chandigarh............Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PR...
Case Number: 110
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/111/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/10/20161. Timple JainPatiala............Appellant(s)Versus1. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd,Chandigarh............Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PR...
Case Number: 111
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/126/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/208/20161. Samir SinghAKS Colony Patiala Road Ward No. 10, Near Gurudwara Zirakpur, Punjab...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.SCO No. 6-8, 1st ...
Case Number: 126
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:418 of 2016Date of Institution:02.08.2016Date of Decision:18.11.2016Vishal Kataria son of Shri Suresh C. Kataria, R/o H.No.B-402, Sector 70, Rishi Apartment, Mohali (Pb.)……Complainant.Ve...
Case Number: 418
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.